Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1857082: Include pod /etc/hosts in ephemeral storage calculation for eviction #25285

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@joelsmith: An error was encountered searching for bug 1857082 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

code 102: You are not authorized to access bug #1857082. Most likely the bug has been restricted for internal development processes and we cannot grant access. If you are a Red Hat customer with an active subscription, please visit the Red Hat Customer Portal for assistance with your issue If you are a Fedora Project user and require assistance, please consider using one of the mailing lists we host for the Fedora Project.
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bug 1857082: Include pod /etc/hosts in ephemeral storage calculation for eviction

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jul 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sjenning: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1857082, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jul 16, 2020
@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: joelsmith, sjenning

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jul 16, 2020
@joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

2 similar comments
@joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test verify-deps

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wow. What is going on with CI?
/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

11 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor Author

Take it easy, bot! This needs a rebase.
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Jul 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Jul 23, 2020
@joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@joelsmith: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/verify-deps e6f598d link /test verify-deps
ci/prow/e2e-cmd e6f598d link /test e2e-cmd
ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips e6f598d link /test e2e-aws-fips
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-upgrade e6f598d link /test e2e-gcp-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@joelsmith
Copy link
Contributor Author

This appeared in the recent rebase #25314. Closing.

@joelsmith joelsmith closed this Aug 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@joelsmith: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1857082. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Bug 1857082: Include pod /etc/hosts in ephemeral storage calculation for eviction

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants