Supercharge Inscriptions with Runes #3538
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Yeah, we've been thinking along similar lines. Would be great to collect some concrete ideas here to see what people want to do with this. |
|
Another approach here by adding the |
|
Thanks for PR but I think if we do this we'll go for the |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a new recursive endpoint -
/r/inscription/:inscription_id/rune/:rune_id- for fetching balance for a given rune token assigned to the inscription UTXO. This would allow combining inscriptions and runes in new ways, and allow artists to incorporate runes in their art.Opening this PR primarily to get the conversation going. I am not fully convinced if this is necessarily the best approach. So, I am curious to hear more thoughts.