Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Develop" #2

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Revert "Develop" #2

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rs-phunt
Copy link
Collaborator

@rs-phunt rs-phunt commented Feb 19, 2024

Reverts #1

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced GitHub Actions workflow for automated build and testing on the master branch and pull requests.
  • Documentation
    • Updated README.md with new badge URLs and minor text changes for environment variable management.
  • Chores
    • Removed NewCops configuration from RuboCop settings.
    • Updated gemspec to reflect changes in metadata requirements.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 19, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The modifications encompass workflow optimization, coding standards adjustment, and documentation enhancement for a Ruby project. A GitHub Actions workflow is introduced for automated build processes, a RuboCop configuration adjustment is made, and the project's documentation and gemspec file are updated to refine development practices and project metadata presentation.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/main.yml Introduced a GitHub Actions workflow for automated builds on Ubuntu with Ruby 3.0.2.
.rubocop.yml Removed NewCops configuration under AllCops.
README.md Updated badge URLs to badge.fury.io and changed gem reference from dotenv to config.
chatworkify.gemspec Removed 'true' from spec.metadata['rubygems_mfa_required'].

🐇✨
In the land of code and ruby gems bright,
Changes arrive, bringing delight.
With workflows set and standards tight,
Our project shines in the moonlight.
Let us hop with joy, for the future's in sight!
🌟📚🔧

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7e72011 and aaa14fa.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/main.yml (1 hunks)
  • .rubocop.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
  • chatworkify.gemspec (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .rubocop.yml
  • README.md
Additional comments: 1
.github/workflows/main.yml (1)
  • 1-27: The GitHub Actions workflow is well-structured and follows best practices for a Ruby project. It correctly specifies triggers, the environment, and the steps needed to build the project. Using the matrix strategy for Ruby versions allows for easy expansion to test against multiple Ruby versions in the future. Caching bundler dependencies is a good practice for speeding up builds. Overall, this configuration is solid and does not appear to have any issues.

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
spec.required_ruby_version = '>= 2.6'

# spec.metadata['allowed_push_host'] = 'TODO: Set to your gem server 'https://example.com''
spec.metadata['rubygems_mfa_required'] = 'true'

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing the rubygems_mfa_required metadata attribute from the gemspec file lowers the security standard for publishing this gem. Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) is a critical security measure, especially for open-source libraries that could be targeted by malicious actors. Consider reinstating this requirement or providing a clear rationale for its removal to ensure the security of the gem and its users.

@rs-phunt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai help

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 19, 2024

CodeRabbit Commands

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant