Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

disttask: fix wrongly add subtask when state transform fail #46259

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 23, 2023

Conversation

ywqzzy
Copy link
Contributor

@ywqzzy ywqzzy commented Aug 21, 2023

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #46261 ref #46258

Problem Summary:
see #46261

  1. When state transform fails, framework still adds subtasks.
  2. can't transform state from cancelling to reverted.(If there are no subtasks for task submitted, this state transform is legal.)

What is changed and how it works?

  1. When state transform fails, check the affected row cnt to skip adding subtask. This error should not be retryable.
  2. When there are no subtasks submitted and the task is canceled, the state transform will be canceling--->reverting--->reverted. Remove the old fast path: canceling--->reverted.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 21, 2023
@tiprow
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Aug 21, 2023

Hi @ywqzzy. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 21, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #46259 (512e706) into master (e8ca3d4) will decrease coverage by 0.5226%.
Report is 29 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 65.2173%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #46259        +/-   ##
================================================
- Coverage   73.3713%   72.8487%   -0.5226%     
================================================
  Files          1285       1309        +24     
  Lines        394530     400667      +6137     
================================================
+ Hits         289472     291881      +2409     
- Misses        86617      90406      +3789     
+ Partials      18441      18380        -61     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 25.8097% <0.0000%> (?)
unit 73.5277% <78.9473%> (+0.1563%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 54.0444% <ø> (ø)
parser 85.0813% <ø> (+0.0048%) ⬆️
br 47.9769% <ø> (-4.2737%) ⬇️

@ywqzzy ywqzzy changed the title disttask: fix wrongly add subtask when state transform fail. disttask: fix wrongly add subtask when state transform fail Aug 21, 2023
@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. label Aug 21, 2023
@ywqzzy ywqzzy requested a review from D3Hunter August 23, 2023 07:17
Copy link
Contributor

@GMHDBJD GMHDBJD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added approved needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Aug 23, 2023
@D3Hunter
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Aug 23, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: D3Hunter, GMHDBJD

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Aug 23, 2023
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Aug 23, 2023

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2023-08-23 07:20:07.602005334 +0000 UTC m=+1306772.151021321: ☑️ agreed by GMHDBJD.
  • 2023-08-23 08:33:36.466752687 +0000 UTC m=+1311181.015768674: ☑️ agreed by D3Hunter.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 8ff9d89 into pingcap:master Aug 23, 2023
5 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Disttask: task state can't transform from canceling to reverted.
4 participants