Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ddl: clean ingest temp data dir in background loop #54008

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 17, 2024

Conversation

tangenta
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #54007

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

Clean ingest temp data dir in background loop

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 13, 2024
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Jun 13, 2024

Hi @tangenta. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 13, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 72.38095% with 29 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 56.1910%. Comparing base (329a980) to head (e8ecaa8).
Report is 15 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #54008         +/-   ##
=================================================
- Coverage   72.5095%   56.1910%   -16.3185%     
=================================================
  Files          1508       1637        +129     
  Lines        431943     610508     +178565     
=================================================
+ Hits         313200     343051      +29851     
- Misses        99351     244133     +144782     
- Partials      19392      23324       +3932     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 37.2107% <36.1904%> (?)
unit 71.4966% <47.6190%> (-0.0005%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 52.9656% <ø> (ø)
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 50.7923% <ø> (+8.5601%) ⬆️

// GenLightningDataDirForTest is only used for test.
var GenLightningDataDirForTest = genLightningDataDir
// CleanUpTempDir reads the temp dir and removes the stale index data.
// This function will get
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

comment is not completed

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

// CleanUpTempDir reads the temp dir and removes the stale index data.
// This function will get
func CleanUpTempDir(ctx context.Context, se sessionctx.Context, path string) {
err := os.MkdirAll(path, 0700)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clean up don't need to create the folder 🤔

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Jun 14, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jun 17, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lance6716, wjhuang2016

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added approved lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Jun 17, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jun 17, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-06-14 08:59:11.948183751 +0000 UTC m=+714306.001495667: ☑️ agreed by lance6716.
  • 2024-06-17 08:11:49.000919725 +0000 UTC m=+16035.486408568: ☑️ agreed by wjhuang2016.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 53901e8 into pingcap:master Jun 17, 2024
23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Decouple clean up ingest temp data from BackendCtxMgr
3 participants