executor: fix random cte error under apply

[windtalker]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #55881

Problem Summary:
The root cause is described in #55881 (comment)

This pr fix it by

1. when close the cte producer, check if e.producer.resTbl.Done() is false, which means the producer is opened without produce, in this case, close will reset the cte producer
2. before produce the cte producer, double check if it is already opened, if not, then open the cte producer before actually produce it.

What changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[tiprow]

Hi @windtalker. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 76.47059% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.4897%. Comparing base (e16613d) to head (3b9b4e0).
Report is 39 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #57294        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   72.8878%   73.4897%   +0.6018%     
================================================
  Files          1667       1669         +2     
  Lines        460775     462643      +1868     
================================================
+ Hits         335849     339995      +4146     
+ Misses       104289     102028      -2261     
+ Partials      20637      20620        -17     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	43.4124% <73.5294%> (?)
unit	72.2728% <76.4705%> (-0.0029%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.7673% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	45.0224% <ø> (-0.0234%)	⬇️

[windtalker]

/test unit-test

[tiprow]

@windtalker: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/test unit-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[windtalker]

/test unit-test

[tiprow]

@windtalker: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/test unit-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[XuHuaiyu]

Is this useless?

[windtalker]

Yes, after reopenTbls, this producer will be opened again, and the hasTbl will be created in openProducerExecutor

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: guo-shaoge, XuHuaiyu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [XuHuaiyu,guo-shaoge]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-11-12 05:58:43.901242433 +0000 UTC m=+335886.092111430: ☑️ agreed by guo-shaoge.
• 2024-11-12 10:27:39.867044915 +0000 UTC m=+352022.057913912: ☑️ agreed by XuHuaiyu.

[hawkingrei]

/retest

[tiprow]

@windtalker: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
fast_test_tiprow	3b9b4e0	link	true	/test fast_test_tiprow

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.5: #57395.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.1: #57409.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.5: #57410.