Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#1489 add surface area to volume ratio factor #1790

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 9, 2021

Conversation

valentinsulzer
Copy link
Member

Description

Add surface area to volume ratio factor

Fixes #1489

Type of change

Please add a line in the relevant section of CHANGELOG.md to document the change (include PR #) - note reverse order of PR #s. If necessary, also add to the list of breaking changes.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Optimization (back-end change that speeds up the code)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Key checklist:

  • No style issues: $ flake8
  • All tests pass: $ python run-tests.py --unit
  • The documentation builds: $ cd docs and then $ make clean; make html

You can run all three at once, using $ python run-tests.py --quick.

Further checks:

  • Code is commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • Tests added that prove fix is effective or that feature works

Copy link
Sponsor Member

@brosaplanella brosaplanella left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, just a question: this is a dimensionless surface area to volume so it is 1 when there is no degradation, right?

pybamm.lithium_ion.DFN(),
pybamm.lithium_ion.NewmanTobias(),
# pybamm.lithium_ion.NewmanTobias(),
Copy link
Sponsor Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should restore this script to its previous version.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oops yes

@valentinsulzer
Copy link
Member Author

Yes it's dimensionless

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 9, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #1790 (1de9c11) into develop (dd77bec) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1790   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    99.28%   99.28%           
========================================
  Files          343      343           
  Lines        18921    18945   +24     
========================================
+ Hits         18786    18810   +24     
  Misses         135      135           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../interface/lithium_plating/irreversible_plating.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ls/interface/lithium_plating/reversible_plating.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...els/submodels/interface/sei/ec_reaction_limited.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...models/interface/sei/electron_migration_limited.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ls/interface/sei/interstitial_diffusion_limited.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...models/submodels/interface/sei/reaction_limited.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...bmodels/interface/sei/solvent_diffusion_limited.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dd77bec...1de9c11. Read the comment docs.

@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer merged commit 884d6e9 into develop Nov 9, 2021
@valentinsulzer valentinsulzer deleted the issue-1489-surface-area branch November 9, 2021 20:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Multiply by surface area to volume ratio
2 participants