Switch to use uv pip install

[CoolCat467]

This pull request follows up on #2956 and is attempting to switch the continuous integration system to use astral.sh' new tool uv.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.61%. Comparing base (fbb9d50) to head (3933ce2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2957      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.63%   99.61%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         121      121              
  Lines       17841    17841              
  Branches     3206     3206              
==========================================
- Hits        17776    17773       -3     
- Misses         46       48       +2     
- Partials       19       20       +1     

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

[A5rocks]

This seems nontrivial, can we break this into 2 prs?

1. replace pip-compile
2. replace pip install

Personally I see (1) as much more valuable-- (2) doesn't change much. Personally I'm more excited by uv's ability to get the lowest compatible version so we can add a new CI run than by it replacing pip install.

[A5rocks]

Some of your changes remind me that we should probably run shellcheck over our scripts...

[A5rocks]

We can probably lead the path with ./ to get this to work like before: astral-sh/uv#6052

[CoolCat467]

Is there a particular reason not to leave it at my current solution?

[A5rocks]

Personal preference TBH. Maybe you disagree but I prefer moving logic out of shell scripts and into program arguments.

Feel free not to do it though.

[CoolCat467]

Some of your changes remind me that we should probably run shellcheck over our scripts...

Problem is, it's written in haskell and the pre-commit integration for it uses docker, which is a mess

[A5rocks]

Some of your changes remind me that we should probably run shellcheck over our scripts...

Problem is, it's written in haskell and the pre-commit integration for it uses docker, which is a mess

Yeah I think it's fine not to check it in CI. It's not like our shell scripts are that important or change often; it's just a nicety.