Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding 2x2u default layout for Boardwalk #10486

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 1, 2020
Merged

Adding 2x2u default layout for Boardwalk #10486

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 1, 2020

Conversation

niclake
Copy link
Contributor

@niclake niclake commented Sep 29, 2020

Description

Adding a default layout for the Boardwalk PCB utilizing 2x 2u keys on the bottom row. This configuration is currently available as an option in Configurator, but is not currently an option in the source.

Types of Changes

  • Keymap/layout/userspace (addition or update)

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project: C, Python
  • I have read the PR Checklist document and have made the appropriate changes.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have tested the changes and verified that they work and don't break anything (as well as I can manage).

@fauxpark fauxpark requested a review from a team October 1, 2020 18:57
@fauxpark fauxpark added the keymap label Oct 1, 2020
@noroadsleft noroadsleft merged commit a13e918 into qmk:master Oct 1, 2020
@noroadsleft
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

(also, ❤️ from a fellow Boardwalk owner who loves 2x2u spacebars)

@niclake niclake deleted the boardwalk-2x2u branch October 1, 2020 20:57
rgoulter pushed a commit to rgoulter/qmk_firmware that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2020
* Adding 2x2u default layout for Boardwalk

* Defining the _RAISE layer
kjganz pushed a commit to kjganz/qmk_firmware that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2020
* Adding 2x2u default layout for Boardwalk

* Defining the _RAISE layer
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants