Fix return value of HRANDFIELD With Values when count is negative

[s-sathish]

Fix return value of HRANDFIELD With Values when count is negative #3017

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 86.66% and project coverage change: +0.01 🎉

Comparison is base (4ed997c) 64.71% compared to head (a80308e) 64.72%.

❗ Current head a80308e differs from pull request most recent head 5aa9918. Consider uploading reports for the commit 5aa9918 to get more accurate results

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3425      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     64.71%   64.72%   +0.01%     
  Complexity     4569     4569              
============================================
  Files           274      274              
  Lines         15254    15279      +25     
  Branches        981      984       +3     
============================================
+ Hits           9871     9890      +19     
- Misses         4968     4973       +5     
- Partials        415      416       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
.../main/java/redis/clients/jedis/CommandObjects.java	82.31% <ø> (ø)
src/main/java/redis/clients/jedis/Jedis.java	85.46% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
...ava/redis/clients/jedis/MultiNodePipelineBase.java	21.87% <ø> (ø)
src/main/java/redis/clients/jedis/Pipeline.java	16.78% <ø> (ø)
...main/java/redis/clients/jedis/TransactionBase.java	12.01% <ø> (ø)
...rc/main/java/redis/clients/jedis/UnifiedJedis.java	71.42% <ø> (ø)
...dis/clients/jedis/commands/HashBinaryCommands.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ava/redis/clients/jedis/commands/HashCommands.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...nts/jedis/commands/HashPipelineBinaryCommands.java	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...s/clients/jedis/commands/HashPipelineCommands.java	0.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 1 more

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[s-sathish]

Hi @sazzad16 I resolved the conflicts and made changes related to RESP3.
I didn't follow much on the RESP3 protocol and don't have much knowledge on it, so not sure if the changes are aligned properly with it. Please have a look.

[sazzad16]

@s-sathish Thank you! You did it well 😃