Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

roslaunch - pass through command-line args to the xmlloader when using the API (kinetic) #1431

Open
srsidd opened this issue Jun 12, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@srsidd
Copy link

srsidd commented Jun 12, 2018

#1115 enables the user to pass command-line args to the xml loader from lunar and upwards. Going through some of the discussions it seems the design was made in such a way that the feature is fully backwards-compatible and minimal changes were made to add the new functionality.

Is there a plan to back port this to Kinetic?

@srsidd srsidd changed the title roslaunch - pass through command-line args to the xmlloader when using the API in kinetic roslaunch - pass through command-line args to the xmlloader when using the API (kinetic) Jun 12, 2018
@dirk-thomas
Copy link
Member

In the PR #1115 you will find a referenced ticket #1323 in which all changes from lunar-devel for a specific time span were considered for backporting. For this patch the following is noted:

pass through command-line args to the xmlloader when using the API #1115

  • new feature, not backported

@srsidd
Copy link
Author

srsidd commented Jun 14, 2018

I see. Is there a process defined on how to back port a feature? I could look into it if it's cherry picking the specific commits from the lunar-dev into the kinetic-dev branch.

@dirk-thomas
Copy link
Member

Is there a process defined on how to back port a feature?

If there is not strong reason to backport a feature (e.g. significantly ease of downstream package maintenance) feature are not being backported. One main goal of a released distribution is stability and therefore "unnecessary" changes are avoided as much as possible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants