Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added RUST_BACKTRACE=1 to enable backtraces #298

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2019
Merged

Conversation

therealprof
Copy link
Contributor

If svd2rust fails its always useful to get some information about the where and why

If svd2rust fails its always useful to get some information about the where and why
@therealprof therealprof requested a review from a team as a code owner May 22, 2019 11:09
@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @ryankurte

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-tools labels May 22, 2019
@therealprof
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors try

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented May 22, 2019

try

Build succeeded

Copy link

@ryankurte ryankurte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@therealprof
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors r=ryankurte

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2019
298: Added RUST_BACKTRACE=1 to enable backtraces r=ryankurte a=therealprof

If svd2rust fails its always useful to get some information about the where and why

Co-authored-by: Daniel Egger <daniel@eggers-club.de>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented May 23, 2019

Build succeeded

@bors bors bot merged commit 24b861d into master May 23, 2019
@bors bors bot deleted the enable-backtrace branch May 23, 2019 08:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-tools
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants