fix: Fix runnables being incorrectly constructed #17549
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Veykril
commented
Jul 6, 2024
| @@ -323,14 +323,6 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| "title": "general", | |||
| "properties": { | |||
| "rust-analyzer.cargoRunner": { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also removes this, the custom runner was broken for ages already so clearly no one is depending on it
|
@bors r+ |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 6, 2024
fix: Fix runnables being incorrectly constructed I've misunderstood parts of the code here which caused runnables to arbitrarily break :) (I have yet to understand the conditions that made them break though, there is some odd caching involved I feel like ...) Fixes #17402
|
@bors r+ |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've misunderstood parts of the code here which caused runnables to arbitrarily break :) (I have yet to understand the conditions that made them break though, there is some odd caching involved I feel like ...)
Fixes #17402