Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Impl DefaultCallbacks on our side #5158

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2020
Merged

Conversation

tesuji
Copy link
Contributor

@tesuji tesuji commented Feb 11, 2020

cc rust-lang/rust#69059 (comment)

changelog: none

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

Rustup ahead of time 🎉 Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 11, 2020

📌 Commit bfc4bd4 has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 11, 2020

⌛ Testing commit bfc4bd4 with merge 0346873...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2020
Impl DefaultCallbacks on our side

cc rust-lang/rust#69059 (comment)

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 11, 2020

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@flip1995 flip1995 added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: The marked PR was approved and is only waiting bors label Feb 11, 2020
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 11, 2020

⌛ Testing commit bfc4bd4 with merge 07f1736...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2020
Impl DefaultCallbacks on our side

cc rust-lang/rust#69059 (comment)

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 11, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing 07f1736 to master...

@bors bors merged commit bfc4bd4 into rust-lang:master Feb 11, 2020
@tesuji tesuji deleted the callbackshook branch February 12, 2020 00:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: The marked PR was approved and is only waiting bors
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants