-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error calling supertrait method via trait reference #4295
Labels
A-traits
Area: Trait system
Comments
Here's a simpler testcase:
|
ghost
assigned catamorphism
Feb 20, 2013
Reproduced with 373504 but not critical for 0.6. |
I guess this is the same as #4100. |
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2022
Downgrade mutex_atomic to nursery See rust-lang#1516 and rust-lang#4295. There are suggestions about removing this lint from the default warned lints in both issues. Also, [`mutex_integer`](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#mutex_integer) lint that has the same problems as this lint is in `nursery` group. changelog: Moved [`mutex_atomic`] to `nursery`
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 12, 2023
Move `mutex_atomic` to `restriction` By rust-lang#4295, the general consensus seems to be that `mutex_atomic` is not a useful lint in most cases. If anything, it could be useful as a restriction on code that for whatever reason can't use atomics. Keeping it in `clippy::nursery` is harmful to people attempting to use clippy for soundness. --- changelog: Moved [`mutex_atomic`] to `restriction` [rust-lang#10115](rust-lang/rust-clippy#10115) <!-- chnagelog_checked -->
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: