Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vec: IntoIterator signature consistency #104056

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2022
Merged

Vec: IntoIterator signature consistency #104056

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2022

Conversation

ripytide
Copy link
Contributor

@ripytide ripytide commented Nov 6, 2022

Also makes the code dryer.

Also makes the code dryer.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 6, 2022

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 6, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 6, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

I'm a little worried this might make rustdoc somewhere a little worse, but I think it shouldn't be a big deal. Seems okay to me.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 7, 2022

📌 Commit 743726e has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 7, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2022
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#103885 (rustdoc: various cross-crate reexport fixes)
 - rust-lang#103914 (Make underscore_literal_suffix a hard error.)
 - rust-lang#104045 (Add type_array to BaseTypeMethods)
 - rust-lang#104056 (Vec: IntoIterator signature consistency)
 - rust-lang#104059 (Fix typo in `rustc_middle/lint.rs`)
 - rust-lang#104062 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `#sidebar-filler`)
 - rust-lang#104065 (Migrate rust logo filter to CSS variables)
 - rust-lang#104066 (LLVM 16: Update RISCV data layout)
 - rust-lang#104074 (rustdoc: Add an example for round that is different from truncate)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 57daec5 into rust-lang:master Nov 7, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Nov 7, 2022
@ripytide ripytide deleted the patch-1 branch November 7, 2022 13:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants