Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

disable strict-provenance-violating doctests in Miri #104710

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2022

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Most of these are on deprecated unstable functions anyway. This lets us run the remaining doctests with -Zmiri-strict-provenance, which I think is a win.

r? @thomcc

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 22, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 22, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@thomcc
Copy link
Member

thomcc commented Nov 22, 2022

Seems good to me.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 22, 2022

📌 Commit 2802eae9baef00c5082d58c35be3fec3b3a77253 has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 22, 2022
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=thomcc

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 22, 2022

📌 Commit 3a95e12 has been approved by thomcc

It is now in the queue for this repository.

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2022
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104295 (Check generics parity before collecting return-position `impl Trait`s in trait)
 - rust-lang#104464 (Reduce exceptions overallocation on non Windows x86_64)
 - rust-lang#104615 (Create def_id for async fns during lowering)
 - rust-lang#104669 (Only declare bindings for if-let guards once per arm)
 - rust-lang#104701 (Remove a lifetime resolution hack from `compare_predicate_entailment`)
 - rust-lang#104710 (disable strict-provenance-violating doctests in Miri)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit a40659d into rust-lang:master Nov 22, 2022
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the doc-strict-provenance branch December 2, 2022 11:11
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Nov 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants