Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 6 pull requests #104711

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Nov 22, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 6 pull requests #104711

merged 14 commits into from
Nov 22, 2022

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

mati865 and others added 14 commits November 15, 2022 23:24
…rity, r=eholk

Check generics parity before collecting return-position `impl Trait`s in trait

The only thing is that this duplicates the error message for number of generics mismatch, but we already deduplicate that error message in Cargo. I could add a flag to delay the error if the reviewer cares.

Fixes rust-lang#104281

Also drive-by adds a few comments to the `collect_trait_impl_trait_tys` method, and removes an unused argument from `compare_number_of_generics`.
…md64, r=thomcc

Reduce exceptions overallocation on non Windows x86_64

Addressing rust-lang#103894 (comment)
…lowering, r=compiler-errors

Create def_id for async fns during lowering

r? `@compiler-errors`
…-bindings, r=cjgillot

Only declare bindings for if-let guards once per arm

Currently, each candidate for a match arm uses separate locals for the bindings in the if-let guard, causing problems (rust-lang#88015) when those branches converge in the arm body.

Fixes rust-lang#88015 (🤞)
…pty-hack, r=TaKO8Ki

Remove a lifetime resolution hack from `compare_predicate_entailment`

This is not needed anymore, probably due to rust-lang#102334 equating the function signatures fully in `collect_trait_impl_trait_tys`. Also, the assertion in in rust-lang#102903 makes sure that this is actually fixed, so I'm pretty confident this isn't needed.
…thomcc

disable strict-provenance-violating doctests in Miri

Most of these are on deprecated unstable functions anyway. This lets us run the remaining doctests with `-Zmiri-strict-provenance`, which I think is a win.

r? `@thomcc`
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Nov 22, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 22, 2022

📌 Commit a40659d has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 22, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 22, 2022

⌛ Testing commit a40659d with merge 66ccf36...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 22, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing 66ccf36 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 22, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 66ccf36 into rust-lang:master Nov 22, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Nov 22, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#104710 b5ca460e1e8c76c94b2ab4442bf8f49f5d6d1c24
#104701 973300c230f3ec31950e09b79d41dfd77492840d
#104669 64f5dd40113f34f862b14b7109ae72d12de17912
#104615 59aec03a7738f2ce516d7ec9ba4107c5da6bd28e
#104464 60dc0c47ab02e388fb0f80db12606e045a747303
#104295 b8eec1b0442bd5a8156ea00bd4c630b1b0335177

previous master: b7463e8bdb

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (66ccf36): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.6% [2.1%, 3.0%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants