Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: Fix a few small issues #105748

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2022
Merged

doc: Fix a few small issues #105748

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2022

Conversation

hakoerber
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, while reading through the (awesome) stdlib docs, I found a few minor typos.

  • A few typos around generic types (; vs ,)
  • Use inline code formatting for code fragments
  • One instance of wrong wording

* A few typos around generic types (`;` vs `,`)
* Use inline code formatting for code fragments
* One instance of wrong wording
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 15, 2022

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @joshtriplett (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 15, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 15, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Thanks
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 16, 2022

📌 Commit 9671dd2 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 16, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#105725 (Allow `impl ~const Trait` opaque types)
 - rust-lang#105744 (Rewrite `E0158` error-code docs for clarity)
 - rust-lang#105747 (Fix ICE calling method on auto trait)
 - rust-lang#105748 (doc: Fix a few small issues)
 - rust-lang#105756 (rustdoc: simplify CSS for codeblock tooltips)
 - rust-lang#105757 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `.sub-settings`)
 - rust-lang#105764 (rustdoc: name the source page sidebar-toggle `#src-sidebar-toggle`)
 - rust-lang#105774 (Remove unused stderr files)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1ad070a into rust-lang:master Dec 16, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Dec 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants