Test the borrowck behavior of if-let guards #106005
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @Nilstrieb (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Noratrieb
requested changes
Dec 21, 2022
LeSeulArtichaut
force-pushed
the
if-let-guard-borrowck-test
branch
from
1dd1913
to
56aaf74
Compare
|
Fixed, thank you very much for the review! |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Noratrieb
approved these changes
Jan 3, 2023
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#104552 (warn newer available version of the x tool) - rust-lang#105681 (some fixes/improvements to mir::visit module) - rust-lang#106005 (Test the borrowck behavior of if-let guards) - rust-lang#106356 (clean: Remove `ctor_kind` from `VariantStruct`.) - rust-lang#106365 (Grammar : Missing "is" in format specifier diagnostic) - rust-lang#106388 (rustdoc: remove legacy box-sizing CSS) - rust-lang#106392 (`has_overflow` only if value is *not* within limit) - rust-lang#106402 (Fix dupe word typos) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add some tests to make sure that if-let guards behave the same as if guards with respect to borrow-checking. Most of them are a naive adaptation, replacing an
ifguard withif let Some(()).This includes regression tests for notable issues that arose for if guards (#24535, #27282, #29723, #31287) as suggested in #51114 (comment).
cc @pnkfelix are there any other tests that you would want to see?
cc tracking issue #51114