Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 9 pull requests #106193

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Dec 28, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 9 pull requests #106193

merged 22 commits into from
Dec 28, 2022

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

matklad and others added 22 commits October 29, 2022 09:56
The signature for new was

```
fn new<F>(f: F) -> Lazy<T, F>
```

Notably, with `F` unconstrained, `T` can be literally anything, and just
`let _ = Lazy::new(|| 92)` would not typecheck.

This historiacally was a necessity -- `new` is a `const` function, it
couldn't have any bounds. Today though, we can move `new` under the `F:
FnOnce() -> T` bound, which gives the compiler enough data to infer the
type of T from closure.
Show the suggestion if and only if the bounds are from the same source context.
This can actually make a difference for the user if they rely on unicode formating.

Prompted by dtolnay/syn#771
This fixes the spelling of "deallocated" (instead of the original "deallocted") In the `cell.rs` source file
More inference-friendly API for lazy

The signature for new was

```
fn new<F>(f: F) -> Lazy<T, F>
```

Notably, with `F` unconstrained, `T` can be literally anything, and just `let _ = Lazy::new(|| 92)` would not typecheck.

This historiacally was a necessity -- `new` is a `const` function, it couldn't have any bounds. Today though, we can move `new` under the `F: FnOnce() -> T` bound, which gives the compiler enough data to infer the type of T from closure.
…rors

Detect likely `.` -> `..` typo in method calls

Fix rust-lang#65015.
…jgillot

Suggest rewriting a malformed hex literal if we expect a float

Fixes rust-lang#104706
…gillot

Provide local extern function arg names

Fixes rust-lang#105896
Partially fix `explicit_outlives_requirements` lint in macros

Show the suggestion if and only if the bounds are from the same source context.

fixes rust-lang#106044
fixes rust-lang#106063
…rors

Fix a formatting error in Iterator::for_each docs

There is a formatting error (extra space in an assignment) in the documentation of `core::iter::Iterator::for_each`, which I have fixed in this pull request.
Fix doc comment parsing description in book

This can actually make a difference for the user if they rely on unicode formating.

Prompted by dtolnay/syn#771
…r-errors

Update the documentation of `Vec` to use `extend(array)` instead of `extend(array.iter().copied())`

Another option is to use `extend_from_slice()` (that may be faster), but I find this approach cleaner.
Fix UnsafeCell Documentation Spelling Error

This fixes the spelling of "deallocated" (instead of the original "deallocted") In the `cell.rs` source file. Honestly probably not worth the time to evaluate, but since it doesn't involve any code change, I figure why not?
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 27, 2022
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=9

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 27, 2022

📌 Commit 49d4346 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 27, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 27, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 49d4346 with merge 739d68a...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 28, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing 739d68a to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 28, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 739d68a into rust-lang:master Dec 28, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Dec 28, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (739d68a): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.3% [2.3%, 2.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.6% [-1.6%, -1.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.2% [-2.2%, -2.2%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.6% [-1.6%, -1.6%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.8% [-3.0%, -2.7%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the rollup-0l54wka branch August 11, 2023 20:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants