Rollup of 6 pull requests #111993
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #111993
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This verifies the intra-doc links are correct, and hopefully makes things easier for new contributors.
This fixes rust-lang#111220 by checking the privacy of tuple constructors using `Self`, so the following code now errors ```rust mod my { pub struct Foo(&'static str); } impl AsRef<str> for my::Foo { fn as_ref(&self) -> &str { let Self(s) = self; // previously compiled, now errors correctly s } } ```
…atch, r=dtolnay Remove structural match from `TypeId` As per rust-lang#99189 (comment). > Removing the structural equality might make sense, but is a breaking change that'd require a libs-api FCP. rust-lang#99189 (comment) > Landing this PR now (well, mainly the "remove structural equality" part) would unblock `const fn` `TypeId::of`, since we only postponed that because we were guaranteeing too much. See also rust-lang#99189, rust-lang#101698
…truct-field, r=lcnr fix for `Self` not respecting tuple Ctor privacy This PR fixes rust-lang#111220 by checking the privacy of tuple constructors using `Self`, so the following code now errors ```rust mod my { pub struct Foo(&'static str); } impl AsRef<str> for my::Foo { fn as_ref(&self) -> &str { let Self(s) = self; // previously compiled, now errors correctly s } } ```
[RFC-2011] Expand more expressions cc rust-lang#44838 Expands `if`, `let`, `match` and also makes `generic_assert_internals` an allowed feature when using `assert!`. `#![feature(generic_assert)]` is still needed to activate everything. ```rust #![feature(generic_assert)] fn fun(a: Option<i32>, b: Option<i32>, c: Option<i32>) { assert!( if a.is_some() { 1 } else { 2 } == 3 && if let Some(elem) = b { elem == 4 } else { false } && match c { Some(_) => true, None => false } ); } fn main() { fun(Some(1), None, Some(2)); } // Assertion failed: assert!( // if a.is_some() { 1 } else { 2 } == 3 // && if let Some(elem) = b { elem == 4 } else { false } // && match c { Some(_) => true, None => false } // ); // // With captures: // a = Some(1) // b = None // c = Some(2) ```
Remove DesugaringKind::Replace. A simple boolean flag is enough.
Generate docs for bootstrap itself This verifies the intra-doc links are correct, and hopefully makes things easier for new contributors. Note that this will conflict with rust-lang#111955, i'm pretty sure i typo-ed some of the intra-doc links lol
…yUwU do not prefer substs relate during coherence r? `@compiler-errors`
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
⌛ Testing commit c98ff21 with merge 35bebc435cf62a6c96553e4770c2de43904f2899... |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
👀 Test was successful, but fast-forwarding failed: 422 Update is not a fast forward |
|
@bors retry |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (35bebc435cf62a6c96553e4770c2de43904f2899): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: 644.999s -> 644.203s (-0.12%) |
|
⌛ Testing commit c98ff21 with merge f10a9fb1f4c514ac47a695916d5cdf1eb845deb3... |
|
Waaait, there something broken, first pr definitely merged. |
|
@bors r- |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
TypeId#103291 (Remove structural match fromTypeId)Selfnot respecting tuple Ctor privacy #111245 (fix forSelfnot respecting tuple Ctor privacy)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup