Rollup of 5 pull requests

[Noratrieb]

Successful merges:

• Use upvar_tys in more places, make it return a list #114079 (Use upvar_tys in more places, make it return a list)
• Add regression test for resolving --extern libc=test.rlib #114166 (Add regression test for resolving --extern libc=test.rlib)
• get auto traits for parallel rustc #114321 (get auto traits for parallel rustc)
• fix and extend ptr_comparison test #114335 (fix and extend ptr_comparison test)
• x.py print more detailed format files and untracked files count #114347 (x.py print more detailed format files and untracked files count)

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[Noratrieb]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

[bors]

📌 Commit da2b237 has been approved by Nilstrieb

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit da2b237 with merge 7637653...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Nilstrieb
Pushing 7637653 to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Message	Perf Build Sha
#114079	Use upvar_tys in more places, make it return a list	95a48011cb537b42adc6617bbd2c541b0f712c90 (link)
#114166	Add regression test for resolving --extern libc=test.rlib	fa17b6bb1be9bcba5393dcda89e6c9c1f4448269 (link)
#114321	get auto traits for parallel rustc	719087beec59df7d0687cc1f234ac27462877c42 (link)
#114335	fix and extend ptr_comparison test	4645eeeb041b870bc2e6b6512e97ba376c0e23c3 (link)
#114347	x.py print more detailed format files and untracked files c…	7d7c8c1f5722bcb20cef523d525e28311b2343a0 (link)

previous master: d170833431

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (7637653): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.2%	[2.2%, 2.2%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.4%	[3.5%, 5.2%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.2%	[-2.2%, -2.2%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.2%	[2.2%, 2.2%]	1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 648.737s -> 649.933s (0.18%)