-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Doc: Fix incorrect reference to integer in Atomic{Ptr,Bool}::as_ptr. #121977
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @workingjubilee (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Doc: Fix incorrect reference to integer in Atomic{Ptr,Bool}::as_ptr. I am assuming "resulting integer" is an error, since we are talking about pointers and booleans here. Seems like it was missed while copy & pasting the docs from the integer versions. I also checked the rest of the docs, and this was the only mention of integers.
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#120976 (constify a couple thread_local statics) - rust-lang#121576 (Convert the rest of the visitors to use `VisitorResult`) - rust-lang#121826 (Use root obligation on E0277 for some cases) - rust-lang#121928 (Extract an arguments struct for `Builder::then_else_break`) - rust-lang#121958 (Fix redundant import errors for preload extern crate) - rust-lang#121959 (Removing absolute path in proc-macro) - rust-lang#121968 (Don't run test_get_os_named_thread on win7) - rust-lang#121977 (Doc: Fix incorrect reference to integer in Atomic{Ptr,Bool}::as_ptr.) - rust-lang#121978 (Fix duplicated path in the "not found dylib" error) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Doc: Fix incorrect reference to integer in Atomic{Ptr,Bool}::as_ptr. I am assuming "resulting integer" is an error, since we are talking about pointers and booleans here. Seems like it was missed while copy & pasting the docs from the integer versions. I also checked the rest of the docs, and this was the only mention of integers.
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#120976 (constify a couple thread_local statics) - rust-lang#121683 (Fix LVI tests after frame pointers are enabled by default) - rust-lang#121703 (Add a way to add constructors for `rustc_type_ir` types) - rust-lang#121732 (Improve assert_matches! documentation) - rust-lang#121928 (Extract an arguments struct for `Builder::then_else_break`) - rust-lang#121939 (Small enhancement to description of From trait) - rust-lang#121968 (Don't run test_get_os_named_thread on win7) - rust-lang#121969 (`ParseSess` cleanups) - rust-lang#121977 (Doc: Fix incorrect reference to integer in Atomic{Ptr,Bool}::as_ptr.) - rust-lang#121994 (Update platform-support.md with supported musl version) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#120976 (constify a couple thread_local statics) - rust-lang#121683 (Fix LVI tests after frame pointers are enabled by default) - rust-lang#121703 (Add a way to add constructors for `rustc_type_ir` types) - rust-lang#121732 (Improve assert_matches! documentation) - rust-lang#121928 (Extract an arguments struct for `Builder::then_else_break`) - rust-lang#121939 (Small enhancement to description of From trait) - rust-lang#121968 (Don't run test_get_os_named_thread on win7) - rust-lang#121969 (`ParseSess` cleanups) - rust-lang#121977 (Doc: Fix incorrect reference to integer in Atomic{Ptr,Bool}::as_ptr.) - rust-lang#121994 (Update platform-support.md with supported musl version) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#121977 - Lee-Janggun:master, r=WaffleLapkin Doc: Fix incorrect reference to integer in Atomic{Ptr,Bool}::as_ptr. I am assuming "resulting integer" is an error, since we are talking about pointers and booleans here. Seems like it was missed while copy & pasting the docs from the integer versions. I also checked the rest of the docs, and this was the only mention of integers.
I am assuming "resulting integer" is an error, since we are talking about pointers and booleans here. Seems like it was missed while copy & pasting the docs from the integer versions. I also checked the rest of the docs, and this was the only mention of integers.