-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 10 pull requests #121995
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 10 pull requests #121995
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This new documentation tries to avoid to limit the impact of the conceptual pitfall, that the if guard relaxes the constraint, when really it tightens it. This is achieved by changing the text and examples. The previous documentation also chose a rather weird and non-representative example for the if guard, that made it needlessly complicated to understand.
- fix small typo - avoid repetition of formulations
Co-authored-by: Josh Stone <cuviper@gmail.com>
It doesn't need a `Parser` and a `ParseSess`, because the former contains the latter.
It's always empty.
Most of this method's arguments are usually or always forwarded as-is to recursive invocations. Wrapping them in a dedicated struct allows us to document each struct field, and lets us use struct-update syntax to indicate which arguments are being modified when making a recursive call.
This test won't work on windows 7, as the Thread::set_name function is not implemented there (win7 does not provide a documented mechanism to set thread names).
Existing names for values of this type are `sess`, `parse_sess`, `parse_session`, and `ps`. `sess` is particularly annoying because that's also used for `Session` values, which are often co-located, and it can be difficult to know which type a value named `sess` refers to. (That annoyance is the main motivation for this change.) `psess` is nice and short, which is good for a name used this much. The commit also renames some `parse_sess_created` values as `psess_created`.
- Refer to trait directly - small typo in encapsulate Co-authored-by: Jubilee <46493976+workingjubilee@users.noreply.github.com>
…r=lcnr constify a couple thread_local statics
Fix LVI tests after frame pointers are enabled by default rust-lang#121203 enables frame pointers by default. This affects LVI mitigations for the `x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx` target. LVI remained mitigated correctly, but the tests were too strict. `@nshyrei` , `@jethrogb`
Add a way to add constructors for `rustc_type_ir` types Introduces a module called `rustc_type_ir`, in which we can place traits which are named `Ty`/`Region`/`Const`/etc. which expose constructors for the `rustc_type_ir` types. This means we can construct things `Interner::Ty` with `Ty::new_x(...)`, which is needed to uplift the new trait solver into an interner-agnostic crate. These traits are placed into a *separate* module because they're only intended to be used in interner-agnostic code, and they should mirror the constructors that are provided by the inherent constructor methods in `rustc_middle`. Putting this up for vibe-check mostly. I haven't copied over any of the type constructors, except for one to create bound types for use in the canonicalizer. r? lcnr
…documentation, r=cuviper Improve assert_matches! documentation This new documentation tries to limit the impact of the conceptual pitfall, that the if guard relaxes the constraint, when really it tightens it. This is achieved by changing the text and examples. The previous documentation also chose a rather weird and non-representative example for the if guard, that made it needlessly complicated to understand.
Extract an arguments struct for `Builder::then_else_break` Most of this method's arguments are usually or always forwarded as-is to recursive invocations. Wrapping them in a dedicated struct allows us to document each struct field, and lets us use struct-update syntax to indicate which arguments are being modified when making a recursive call. --- While trying to understand the lowering of `if` expressions, I found it difficult to keep track of the half-dozen arguments passed through to every call to `then_else_break`. I tried switching over to an arguments struct, and I found that it really helps to make sense of what each argument does, and how each call is modifying the arguments. I have some further ideas for how to streamline these recursive calls, but I've kept those out of this PR so that it's a pure refactoring with no behavioural changes.
…escr, r=workingjubilee Small enhancement to description of From trait - fix small typo - avoid repetition of formulations
Don't run test_get_os_named_thread on win7 This test won't work on windows 7, as the Thread::set_name function is not implemented there (win7 does not provide a documented mechanism to set thread names).
…wesleywiser `ParseSess` cleanups The main change here is to rename all `ParseSess` values as `psess`. Plus a few other small cleanups. r? `@wesleywiser`
Doc: Fix incorrect reference to integer in Atomic{Ptr,Bool}::as_ptr. I am assuming "resulting integer" is an error, since we are talking about pointers and booleans here. Seems like it was missed while copy & pasting the docs from the integer versions. I also checked the rest of the docs, and this was the only mention of integers.
…cs, r=ehuss Update platform-support.md with supported musl version This just reflects the current status quo, there is no actual change here since the update to musl 1.2.3 occurred in rust-lang#107129 and was approved in rust-lang/compiler-team#572. I also normalized all mentions of musl libc to "musl" (non-capitalized per the project's site and Wikipedia page). r? `@ehuss`
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Mar 4, 2024
rustbot
added
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Mar 4, 2024
@bors r+ rollup=never p=10 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 4, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
rustc_type_ir
types #121703 (Add a way to add constructors forrustc_type_ir
types)Builder::then_else_break
#121928 (Extract an arguments struct forBuilder::then_else_break
)ParseSess
cleanups #121969 (ParseSess
cleanups)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup