Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

skip target sanity check when it's a local-rebuild #130261

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

onur-ozkan
Copy link
Member

@onur-ozkan onur-ozkan commented Sep 12, 2024

Running the stage0 target sanity check on the newly built compiler can result in errors and incorrect assumptions.

Resolves #130242

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 12, 2024

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 12, 2024

Some changes occurred in src/tools/opt-dist

cc @Kobzol

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) labels Sep 12, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Running the stage0 target sanity check on the newly built compiler can result
in errors and incorrect assumptions.

Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Sep 12, 2024

Do we also need to revert https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-perf/pull/1973/files and do the same as this PR? (because the target tests had the same issues on perf.rlo as opt-dist and "broke" the bootstrapping benchmark)

@onur-ozkan
Copy link
Member Author

Do we also need to revert https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-perf/pull/1973/files and do the same as this PR? (because the target tests had the same issues on perf.rlo as opt-dist and "broke" the bootstrapping benchmark)

That doesn't really seem like a local rebuild.

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Sep 12, 2024

Could you please comment out DIST_TRY_BUILD in src/ci/github-actions/jobs.yml and do a try build for dist-x86_64-linux?

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 12, 2024
@onur-ozkan
Copy link
Member Author

Could you please comment out DIST_TRY_BUILD in src/ci/github-actions/jobs.yml and do a try build for dist-x86_64-linux?

Sure.

@bors try

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 12, 2024

⌛ Trying commit 98e3406 with merge f9a4006...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2024
skip target sanity check when it's a `local-rebuild`

Running the stage0 target sanity check on the newly built compiler can result in errors and incorrect assumptions.

Resolves rust-lang#130242

try-job: dist-x86_64-linux
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 12, 2024

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: f9a4006 (f9a400647f18b8572a14999e43b3bbc9c84cae20)

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Sep 12, 2024

You can r=me after reverting the temporary change.

@onur-ozkan onur-ozkan removed A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 12, 2024
@onur-ozkan
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=Kobzol

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 12, 2024

📌 Commit 654513e has been approved by Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 12, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2024
Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#130245 (make basic allocation functions track_caller in Miri for nicer backtraces)
 - rust-lang#130261 (skip target sanity check when it's a `local-rebuild`)
 - rust-lang#130287 (rustdoc: rename `issue-\d+.rs` tests to have meaningful names (part 9))

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 26bda05 into rust-lang:master Sep 13, 2024
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.83.0 milestone Sep 13, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#130261 - onur-ozkan:rust-lang#130242, r=Kobzol

skip target sanity check when it's a `local-rebuild`

Running the stage0 target sanity check on the newly built compiler can result in errors and incorrect assumptions.

Resolves rust-lang#130242
@onur-ozkan onur-ozkan deleted the #130242 branch September 13, 2024 14:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Target sanity-check in bootstrap incorrect when doing a local-rebuild
7 participants