-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix/update teach_note from 'escaping mutable ref/ptr' const-check #131397
Conversation
r? @chenyukang rustbot has assigned @chenyukang. Use |
Cc @rust-lang/wg-const-eval |
24deacc
to
6cbfc37
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
6cbfc37
to
287eb03
Compare
Cc @ehuss since this is documentation-related |
@bors r+ rollup |
…=chenyukang fix/update teach_note from 'escaping mutable ref/ptr' const-check The old note was quite confusing since it talked about statics, but the message is also shown for consts. So let's reword to something that is true for both of them.
💥 Test timed out |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
@bors retry timeout |
@bors retry timeout |
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#130625 (Fix a few relative paths in rustc doc) - rust-lang#131397 (fix/update teach_note from 'escaping mutable ref/ptr' const-check) - rust-lang#131479 (Apple: Avoid redundant `-Wl,-dylib` flag when linking) - rust-lang#131480 (Fix hardcoded strip path when cross-compiling from Linux to Darwin) - rust-lang#131482 (structurally resolve adts and tuples expectations too) - rust-lang#131484 (Add myself back to review rotation) - rust-lang#131491 (impossible obligations fast path) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Rollup merge of rust-lang#131397 - RalfJung:const-escaping-ref-teach, r=chenyukang fix/update teach_note from 'escaping mutable ref/ptr' const-check The old note was quite confusing since it talked about statics, but the message is also shown for consts. So let's reword to something that is true for both of them.
The old note was quite confusing since it talked about statics, but the message is also shown for consts. So let's reword to something that is true for both of them.