-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace syntax's SmallVector with AccumulateVec #37551
Conversation
Also cc #37371, which has some discussion on expanding/generalizing SmallVector. |
_ => unreachable!() | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This code would look better with @ticki's replace_with, but it's not altogether that bad without either.
LLVM gets confused by |
There should probably be two types still, at least a |
c2ea97d
to
2d8ee6f
Compare
Alright, the implementation now consists of This currently doesn't compile, but I don't know why--from what I can tell, I didn't change the method signatures shown here.
Edit: Also, as a sidenote, this error message could really be improved: I can't tell what is being moved out of borrowed content. cc @jonathandturner. |
That's an odd error - are you sure you didn't change a signature by accident? |
743fb75
to
1894f71
Compare
The current code segfaults with this backtrace. I don't know why this is, and would appreciate any suggestions.
|
Hmm, after removing the derives for
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So I'm not sure if this causes the observed bug, but the iteration order is definitely wrong.
pub fn pop(&mut self) -> Option<A::Element> { | ||
if self.count > 0 { | ||
let arr = &mut self.values as &mut [ManuallyDrop<_>]; | ||
let value = mem::replace(&mut arr[self.count - 1], ManuallyDrop::new()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You don't need mem::replace
, you can just do ptr::read(&arr[self.count - 1].value)
.
Also, you can decrement first, and use self.count
then.
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl<A: Array> Iterator for ArrayVec<A> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why? You could make a forward by-value iterator if you wanted to (by having an ArrayVec
and a start index), and then implement IntoIterator
on ArrayVec
.
|
||
fn next(&mut self) -> Option<A::Element> { | ||
match self.repr { | ||
IntoIterRepr::Array(ref mut arr) => arr.pop(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not a good idea at all, it goes in the reverse order!
86b96e4
to
128d756
Compare
fn into_iter(self) -> Self::IntoIter { | ||
match *self { | ||
AccumulateVec::Array(ref arr) => arr.iter(), | ||
AccumulateVec::Heap(ref vec) => vec.iter(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can just self.iter()
- same for the mutable version below.
cb581ec
to
c5b951a
Compare
fn encode<S: Encoder>(&self, s: &mut S) -> Result<(), S::Error> { | ||
s.emit_seq(self.len(), |s| { | ||
for (i, e) in self.iter().enumerate() { | ||
try!(s.emit_seq_elt(i, |s| e.encode(s))); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can use ?
instead of try!
here and below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was going to, but then we need to add ?
to the feature list and I recalled needing to mess with cfg(stage0) or something like that in order for that to work properly.
I can change it if you'd like, though--let me know.
f? @erickt |
77acf35
to
8380d32
Compare
Eh, it looks fine enough for me. @bors r+ |
📌 Commit 8380d32 has been approved by |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #37246) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
8380d32
to
7bbebb1
Compare
Rebased. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 7bbebb1 has been approved by |
…ddyb Replace syntax's SmallVector with AccumulateVec This adds a new type to data_structures, `SmallVec`, which wraps `AccumulateVec` with support for re-allocating onto the heap (`SmallVec::reserve`). `SmallVec` is then used to replace the implementation of `SmallVector` in libsyntax. r? @eddyb Fixes rust-lang#37371. Using `SmallVec` instead of libsyntax's `SmallVector` will provide the `N = 2/4` case easily (just needs a few more `Array` impls). cc @nnethercote, probably interested in this area
This is nice, thank you. I particularly like that you found a way to let N be choosable. E.g. I was looking at |
…ddyb Replace syntax's SmallVector with AccumulateVec This adds a new type to data_structures, `SmallVec`, which wraps `AccumulateVec` with support for re-allocating onto the heap (`SmallVec::reserve`). `SmallVec` is then used to replace the implementation of `SmallVector` in libsyntax. r? @eddyb Fixes rust-lang#37371. Using `SmallVec` instead of libsyntax's `SmallVector` will provide the `N = 2/4` case easily (just needs a few more `Array` impls). cc @nnethercote, probably interested in this area
Rollup of 30 pull requests - Successful merges: #37190, #37368, #37481, #37503, #37527, #37535, #37551, #37584, #37600, #37613, #37615, #37659, #37662, #37669, #37682, #37688, #37690, #37692, #37693, #37694, #37695, #37696, #37698, #37699, #37705, #37708, #37709, #37716, #37724, #37727 - Failed merges: #37640, #37689, #37717
This adds a new type to data_structures,
SmallVec
, which wrapsAccumulateVec
with support for re-allocating onto the heap (SmallVec::reserve
).SmallVec
is then used to replace the implementation ofSmallVector
in libsyntax.r? @eddyb
Fixes #37371. Using
SmallVec
instead of libsyntax'sSmallVector
will provide theN = 2/4
case easily (just needs a few moreArray
impls).cc @nnethercote, probably interested in this area