Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

travis: Don't use -9 on gzip #38609

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2016
Merged

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

I timed this locally and plain old gzip took 2m06s while gzip -9 took a
whopping 6m23s to save a mere 4MB out of 1.2GB. Let's shave a few minutes off
the Android builder by turning down the compression level.

I timed this locally and plain old `gzip` took 2m06s while `gzip -9` took a
whopping 6m23s to save a mere 4MB out of 1.2GB. Let's shave a few minutes off
the Android builder by turning down the compression level.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@japaric
Copy link
Member

japaric commented Dec 26, 2016

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 26, 2016

📌 Commit 67cc77c has been approved by japaric

@japaric japaric assigned japaric and unassigned nikomatsakis Dec 26, 2016
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: rollup

alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2016
travis: Don't use -9 on gzip

I timed this locally and plain old `gzip` took 2m06s while `gzip -9` took a
whopping 6m23s to save a mere 4MB out of 1.2GB. Let's shave a few minutes off
the Android builder by turning down the compression level.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2016
@bors bors merged commit 67cc77c into rust-lang:master Dec 30, 2016
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the less-compress branch December 30, 2016 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants