Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 9 pull requests #40635

Closed
wants to merge 26 commits into from
Closed

Rollup of 9 pull requests #40635

wants to merge 26 commits into from

Conversation

jimmycuadra and others added 26 commits March 15, 2017 07:51
Per discussion on the tracking issue, naming `TryFrom`'s associated type
`Error` is generally more consistent with similar traits in the Rust
ecosystem, and what people seem to assume it should be called. It
also helps disambiguate from `Result::Err`, the most common "Err".

See
rust-lang#33417 (comment).

TryFrom<&str> and FromStr are equivalent, so have the latter provide the
former to ensure that. Using TryFrom in the implementation of
`str::parse` means types that implement either trait can use it.
When we're ready to stabilize `TryFrom`, we should update `FromStr` to
suggest implementing `TryFrom<&str>` instead for new code.

See
rust-lang#33417 (comment)
and
rust-lang#33417 (comment).

Refs rust-lang#33417.
This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.
Unfortunately it was reverted back to a broken state in
e06c515 by accident, so let's bring it forward
again!
…uron

Rename TryFrom's associated type and implement str::parse using TryFrom.

Per discussion on the tracking issue, naming `TryFrom`'s associated type `Error` is generally more consistent with similar traits in the Rust ecosystem, and what people seem to assume it should be called. It also helps disambiguate from `Result::Err`, the most common "Err".

See rust-lang#33417 (comment).

`TryFrom<&str>` and `FromStr` are equivalent, so have the latter provide the former to ensure that. Using `TryFrom` in the implementation of `str::parse` means types that implement either trait can use it. When we're ready to stabilize `TryFrom`, we should update `FromStr` to
suggest implementing `TryFrom<&str>` instead for new code.

See rust-lang#33417 (comment)
and rust-lang#33417 (comment).

Refs rust-lang#33417.
Library stabilizations for 1.17

Details of the stabilizations are available in the commits. Includes only library stabilizations; there are a couple of compiler stabilizations that should also be done for 1.17.

Will need a beta backport, which I will create after approval.

r? @alexcrichton
Remove unused param from bootstrap::clean::rm_rf

None
…wsxcv

Fix const not displayed in rustdoc

Fixes rust-lang#40331.

r? @rust-lang/docs
documented order of conversion between u32 an ipv4addr

This fixes rust-lang#40118
…uillaumeGomez

minor wording tweak to slice::{as_ptr, as_mut_ptr}

Per rust-lang#37334, the slice-as-pointer methods mentioned that "modifying the slice may cause its buffer to be reallocated", when in fact modifying the *slice* itself would cause no such change. (It is a borrow, after all!) This is a tweak to the wording of that line to stress it's the *collection* that could cause the buffer to be reallocated.

r? @steveklabnik
Fix typo in mutex.rs docs

This seems to match other uses of "be accessed" in the document.
…sfackler

Fix a spelling error in HashMap documentation, and slightly reword surrounding text for precision

Noticed while reading docs just now.

It's possible that the prior wording *meant* to state that the seed's randomness depends on the exact instant that the system RNG was created, I guess.  But unless there's an API guarantee that this is the case, the wording seems over-precise.  Is there a formal API guarantee that would forbid, say, the system RNG from generating all output using the Intel RDRAND instruction?  I don't think the quality of output in that case would depend on when the RNG was created.  Yet it seems to me like it could well be a valid source of randomness when computing the initial seed.

For that reason, tying the randomness of the seed, to the quality of the RNG's output *at the precise instant the seed is computed*, seems less confining.  That instantaneous quality level could be determined by the quality at the instant the RNG was created -- but instantaneous quality need not be low for that precise reason.
…alexcrichton

Update the cargo submodule again

Unfortunately it was reverted back to a broken state in
e06c515 by accident, so let's bring it forward
again!

Closes rust-lang/cargo#3844
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @aturon (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=10

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 18, 2017

📌 Commit 5c4326f has been approved by frewsxcv

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 18, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 5c4326f with merge 2e3f86c...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 18, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Mar 18, 2017

thread 'main' panicked at '

command did not execute successfully, got: exit code: 2

build script failed, must exit now', /Users/travis/.cargo/registry/src/gh.neting.cc-1ecc6299db9ec823/cmake-0.1.21/src/lib.rs:605

note: Run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace.

I can't even

@bors retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 18, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 5c4326f with merge 363ea24...

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Mar 18, 2017

details:

DEBUG:sccache::commands: Server sent CompileStarted

DEBUG:sccache::commands: Server sent UnhandledCompile

error: failed to execute compile

caused by: failed to spawn child

caused by: Broken pipe (os error 32)

cc @alexcrichton

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Mar 18, 2017

@bors retry

Why don't the Mac builders start?

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 18, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 5c4326f with merge b0f1a3c...

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member Author

I'm going to open a new rollup so we can at least test things on the other platforms

@frewsxcv frewsxcv closed this Mar 18, 2017
@frewsxcv frewsxcv deleted the rollup branch March 18, 2017 23:00
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.