-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[beta] Fix link to book repo #41365
[beta] Fix link to book repo #41365
Conversation
r? @brson (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
This seems like a good idea to me. Is it okay to r+? Or is there some more process involved since it's a beta merge |
Beta stuff gets merged by hand; as sorta "release managers", @brson and or @alexcrichton should make the call and they'll take care of it ❤️ |
@bors: r+ p=1 yeah definitely sounds like a good backport! (p=1 as it's a "backport") |
📌 Commit 1605636 has been approved by |
@steveklabnik is this a backport of a PR to master? (just wondering what to tag Also yeah feel free to r+ backports, we still manually bump the beta version number but other than that if a team wants a backport anyone can make a PR and r+ it, no need to wait for me/brson! |
yes, that would have been rust-lang/book#564 (since the book is in its own repo, there isn't a matching PR in this one to tag
Oh right! I forgot we actually use @bors for this now 🎊 |
Ok cool no worries, the tags are mostly advisory anyway to track what we need to backport, it's pretty rare to track what we did backport. |
⌛ Testing commit 1605636 with merge 8ba21de... |
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
This failed because of #41396, a retry won't help at the moment. |
@bors: retry
|
⌛ Testing commit 1605636 with merge 5b85907... |
@alexcrichton you were optimistic to think that the fuchsia fix would land on the first try ;) This is going to fail again. |
@bors retry |
⌛ Testing commit 1605636 with merge 2a17bb1... |
…lexcrichton [beta] Fix link to book repo This is a backport to beta, to be clear. I don't think we *have* to take this, but opened this PR to see if we should consider it to save six weeks of breakage. Due to extracting the book out into its own repo, this link is broken. This fixes it to point to the right place. This was originally filed as rust-lang/book#633.
@bors retry prioritizing beta rollup |
This is a backport to beta, to be clear. I don't think we have to take this, but opened this PR to see if we should consider it to save six weeks of breakage.
Due to extracting the book out into its own repo, this link is broken. This fixes it to point to the right place. This was originally filed as rust-lang/book#633.