Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[beta] travis: Use upstream LLVM repositories for Fuchsia #41397

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 20, 2017
Merged

[beta] travis: Use upstream LLVM repositories for Fuchsia #41397

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 20, 2017

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This is a backport of #41130 which...

Closes #41396

@petrhosek @alexcrichton
travis: Use upstream LLVM repositories for Fuchsia
f5cc0de 
The Fuchsia copies of LLVM repositories contain additional patches
for work-in-progress features and there is some amount of churn that
may break Rust. Use upstream LLVM repositories instead for building
the toolchain used by the Fuchsia builder.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @aturon

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

warning Warning warning

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against beta. Please double check that you specified the right target!

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=aidanhs p=1

(beta backport)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 19, 2017

📌 Commit f5cc0de has been approved by aidanhs

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 19, 2017

⌛ Testing commit f5cc0de with merge 31d51d5...

@alexcrichton alexcrichton mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2017
Merged
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 19, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@aidanhs aidanhs mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2017
Closed
@aidanhs
Copy link
Member

aidanhs commented Apr 19, 2017 

Undefined symbols for architecture i386:

  "_OBJ_bsearch_ex_", referenced from:

      _sk_find in libcrypto.a(stack.o)

      _sk_find_ex in libcrypto.a(stack.o)

ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture i386

Possible variant of #40417? Definitely unrelated to this PR.

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Apr 19, 2017

Looks like it

@bors retry

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

@bors p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 19, 2017

⌛ Testing commit f5cc0de with merge be2574b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 19, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@aidanhs
Copy link
Member

aidanhs commented Apr 19, 2017

Time limit exceeded. Looks like it rebuilt the docker image. sccache should have everything cached now so should work with a retry?

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2017
@frewsxcv
Rollup merge of rust-lang#41397 - alexcrichton:beta-next, r=aidanhs
afa2587 
[beta] travis: Use upstream LLVM repositories for Fuchsia

This is a backport of rust-lang#41130 which...

Closes rust-lang#41396
@frewsxcv frewsxcv mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2017
Merged
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2017
@bors
Auto merge of #41406 - frewsxcv:rollup, r=frewsxcv
e64b987 
[beta] Rollup of 2 pull requests

- Successful merges: #41365, #41397
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit f5cc0de into rust-lang:beta Apr 20, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 20, 2017

⌛ Testing commit f5cc0de with merge e64b987...

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Apr 21, 2017

@bors r-

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@aturon aturon

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
8 participants
@alexcrichton @rust-highfive @bors @aidanhs @arielb1 @frewsxcv @aturon @petrhosek