Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #41591

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Apr 28, 2017
Merged

Rollup of 7 pull requests #41591

merged 12 commits into from
Apr 28, 2017

Conversation

estebank and others added 12 commits April 25, 2017 22:03
`try_index_step` does not resolve type variables by itself and would
fail otherwise. Also harden the failure path in `confirm` to cause less
confusing errors.
Adding links and examples for various mspc pages rust-lang#29377

Adding links and copying examples for the various Iterators; adding some extra stuff to `Sender`/`SyncSender`/`Receiver`.
…richton

LLVM: Update submodule to fix incorrect codegen on MSP430.

The bug was reported by @akovaski here:
rust-embedded/wg#20 (comment)

~~P.S. Looks like this patch will conflict with Hexagon changes.~~

r? @alexcrichton
Bump mdbook dep to pick up new 'create missing' toggle feature.

This will avoid obscure Travis CI error messages:

* rust-lang#40290 (comment)

Original mdbook issue:

* https://github.com/azerupi/mdBook/issues/253

mdbook PR:

* https://github.com/azerupi/mdBook/pull/254
typeck: resolve type vars before calling `try_index_step`

`try_index_step` does not resolve type variables by itself and would
fail otherwise. Also harden the failure path in `confirm` to cause less
confusing errors.

r? @eddyb

Fixes rust-lang#41498.

beta-nominating because regression (caused by rust-lang#41279).
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @aturon (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=10

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 27, 2017

📌 Commit 1cd3d2f has been approved by frewsxcv

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 1cd3d2f with merge 70baf4f...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2017
Rollup of 7 pull requests

- Successful merges: #41438, #41523, #41526, #41546, #41556, #41572, #41578
- Failed merges:
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: frewsxcv
Pushing 70baf4f to master...

@bors bors merged commit 1cd3d2f into rust-lang:master Apr 28, 2017
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants