Update docs for fmt::write. #42831
Update docs for fmt::write. #42831
Conversation
I reworded it slightly to make it more clear that the function only take two arguments - the output and the Arguments struct that can be generated from the format_args! macro. r? @steveklabnik
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
|
Thanks @rthomas, we'll get @steveklabnik (or someone) to review this and your other PRs soon! |
shepmaster
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ Thanks! |
|
📌 Commit b9a44fc has been approved by |
|
@bors rollup |
Update docs for fmt::write. rust-lang#29355 I reworded it slightly to make it more clear that the function only take two arguments - the output and the Arguments struct that can be generated from the format_args! macro. r? @steveklabnik
Update docs for fmt::write. rust-lang#29355 I reworded it slightly to make it more clear that the function only take two arguments - the output and the Arguments struct that can be generated from the format_args! macro. r? @steveklabnik
Update docs for fmt::write. rust-lang#29355 I reworded it slightly to make it more clear that the function only take two arguments - the output and the Arguments struct that can be generated from the format_args! macro. r? @steveklabnik
#29355
I reworded it slightly to make it more clear that the function only take
two arguments - the output and the Arguments struct that can be
generated from the format_args! macro.
r? @steveklabnik