Remove no longer necessary comparison to Vec::splice. #50013
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
`String::replace_range` was previously called `String::splice`, so this note was necessary to differentiate it from the `Vec` method. Now that it's renamed, this note no longer seems necessary.
|
r? @rust-lang/docs |
|
Thanks! @bors: r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 01e8beb has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2018
…umeGomez Remove no longer necessary comparison to Vec::splice. `String::replace_range` was previously called `String::splice`, so this note was necessary to differentiate it from the `Vec` method. Now that it's renamed, this note no longer seems necessary.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
String::replace_rangewas previously calledString::splice, so thisnote was necessary to differentiate it from the
Vecmethod. Now thatit's renamed, this note no longer seems necessary.