Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enclose type in backticks for "non-exhaustive patterns" error #56114

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2018

Conversation

varkor
Copy link
Member

@varkor varkor commented Nov 20, 2018

This makes the error style consistent with the convention in error messages.

This makes the error style consistent with the convention in error messages.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 20, 2018
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 26, 2018

📌 Commit f039872 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 26, 2018
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2018
…ikomatsakis

Enclose type in backticks for "non-exhaustive patterns" error

This makes the error style consistent with the convention in error messages.
pietroalbini added a commit to pietroalbini/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2018
…ikomatsakis

Enclose type in backticks for "non-exhaustive patterns" error

This makes the error style consistent with the convention in error messages.
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2018
…ikomatsakis

Enclose type in backticks for "non-exhaustive patterns" error

This makes the error style consistent with the convention in error messages.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2018
Rollup of 22 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #55391 (bootstrap: clean up a few clippy findings)
 - #56021 (avoid features_untracked)
 - #56023 (atomic::Ordering: Get rid of misleading parts of intro)
 - #56080 (Reduce the amount of bold text at doc.rlo)
 - #56114 (Enclose type in backticks for "non-exhaustive patterns" error)
 - #56124 (Fix small doc mistake on std::io::read::read_to_end)
 - #56127 (Update an outdated comment in mir building)
 - #56148 (Add rustc-guide as a submodule)
 - #56149 (Make std::os::unix/linux::fs::MetadataExt::a/m/ctime* documentation clearer)
 - #56220 (Suggest appropriate place for lifetime when declared after type arguments)
 - #56223 (Make JSON output from -Zprofile-json valid)
 - #56236 (Remove unsafe `unsafe` inner function.)
 - #56255 (Update outdated code comments in StringReader)
 - #56257 (rustc-guide has moved to rust-lang/)
 - #56273 (Add missing doc link)
 - #56289 (Fix small typo in comment of thread::stack_size)
 - #56294 (Fix a typo in the documentation of std::ffi)
 - #56312 (Deduplicate literal -> constant lowering)
 - #56319 (fix futures creating aliasing mutable and shared ref)
 - #56321 (rustdoc: add bottom margin spacing to nested lists)
 - #56322 (resolve: Fix false-positives from lint `absolute_paths_not_starting_with_crate`)
 - #56330 (Clean up span in non-trailing `..` suggestion)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit f039872 into rust-lang:master Nov 29, 2018
@varkor varkor deleted the nonexhaustive-backticks branch November 29, 2018 15:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants