Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

remove feature gate in control_flow examples #94283

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2022
Merged

remove feature gate in control_flow examples #94283

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2022
+0 −2

Conversation

hellow554
Copy link
Contributor

Stabilization was done in #91091, but the two examples weren't updated accordingly.

Probably too late to put it into stable, but it should be in the next release :)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 23, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

r? @Dylan-DPC

@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 23, 2022

📌 Commit c403424 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 23, 2022
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Feb 24, 2022
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2022
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#94314 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-hmed8n7, r=matthi…
1204400 
…askrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#89887 (Change `char` type in debuginfo to DW_ATE_UTF)
 - rust-lang#94267 (Remove unused ordering derivations and bounds for `SimplifiedTypeGen`)
 - rust-lang#94270 (Miri: relax fn ptr check)
 - rust-lang#94273 (add matching doc to errorkind)
 - rust-lang#94283 (remove feature gate in control_flow examples)
 - rust-lang#94288 (Cleanup a few Decoder methods)
 - rust-lang#94292 (riscv32imc_esp_espidf: set max_atomic_width to 64)
 - rust-lang#94296 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)
 - rust-lang#94300 (Fix a typo in documentation of `array::IntoIter::new_unchecked`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit f3433d1 into rust-lang:master Feb 24, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.61.0 milestone Feb 24, 2022
@bugadani bugadani mentioned this pull request Feb 25, 2022
Closed
@ehuss ehuss added the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Feb 25, 2022
@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Feb 25, 2022

Beta nominated to avoid confusion.

@ehuss ehuss added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Feb 25, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

CI did not catch this because the feature gate is still unstable -- it's probably not used for these examples, which is why removing it is fine, but I think we don't track libs feature usage at such a level?

@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Mar 2, 2022

I'm not sure I understand the comment. The control_flow_enum feature was needed previously. When it was stabilized, it was split off to control_flow_enum_is. However, that's not really important. Doc tests don't deny warnings (they don't show at all), so the stable_features lint has no effect. CI currently doesn't check for things like this.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Yeah, @Urgau pointed me to the rustdoc allow list -- that's likely the real issue here.

That said, it does look like there are some unstable remnants too still under control_flow_enum (

rust/library/core/src/ops/control_flow.rs

Line 177 in 08504c6

#[unstable(feature = "control_flow_enum", reason = "new API", issue = "75744")]
).

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added the beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Mar 9, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Discussed briefly in an ad-hoc libs meeting (with very partial attendance), but in any case, seems like a reasonable backport. Approving.

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum modified the milestones: 1.61.0, 1.60.0 Mar 14, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Mar 14, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum mentioned this pull request Mar 14, 2022
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2022
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#94933 - Mark-Simulacrum:beta-next, r=Mark-Sim…
99f967e 
…ulacrum

[beta] backports

* Update LLVM submodule rust-lang#94764
* Statically compile libstdc++ everywhere if asked rust-lang#94719
* Downgrade #[test] on macro call to warning rust-lang#94624
* Delay bug in expr adjustment when check_expr is called multiple times rust-lang#94596
* bootstrap: correct reading of flags for llvm rust-lang#94466
* Check method input expressions once rust-lang#94438
* remove feature gate in control_flow examples rust-lang#94283

r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC

Labels
beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.60.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@hellow554 @rust-highfive @Dylan-DPC @bors @ehuss @Mark-Simulacrum @rustbot