Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #95798

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Apr 8, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 7 pull requests #95798

merged 14 commits into from
Apr 8, 2022

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

compiler-errors and others added 14 commits March 23, 2022 22:17
…jackh726

Add known-bug for rust-lang#95034

Couldn't fix the issue, since I am no type theorist and inference variables in universes above U0 scare me. But I at least wanted to add a known-bug test for it.

cc rust-lang#95034 (does not fix)
Add `<[[T; N]]>::flatten{_mut}`

Adds `flatten` to convert `&[[T; N]]` to `&[T]` (and `flatten_mut` for `&mut [[T; N]]` to `&mut [T]`)
Mailmap update

I noticed there are a lot of contributors who appear multiple times in https://thanks.rust-lang.org/rust/all-time/, which makes their "rank" on that page inaccurate. For example Nick Cameron currently appears at rank 21 with 2010 contributions and at rank 27 with 1287 contributions, because some of those are from nrc&rust-lang#8288;```@ncameron.org``` and some from ncameron&rust-lang#8288;```@mozilla.com.``` In reality Nick's rank would be 11 if counted correctly, which is a large difference.

Solving this in a totally automated way is tricky because it involves figuring out whether Nick is 1 person with multiple emails, or is 2 people sharing the same name.

This PR addresses a subset of the cases: only where a person has committed under multiple names using the same email. This is still not something that can be totally automated (e.g. by modifying https://github.com/rust-lang/thanks to dedup by email instead of name+email) because:

- Some emails are not necessarily unique to one contributor, such as `ubuntu@localhost`.

- It involves some judgement and mindfulness in picking the "canonical name" among the names used with a particular email. This is the name that will appear on thanks.rust-lang.org. Humans change their names sometimes and can be sensitive or picky about the use of names that are no longer preferred.

For the purpose of this PR, I've tried to stick to the following heuristics which should be unobjectionable:

- If one of the names is currently set as the display name on the contributor's GitHub profile, prefer that name.

- If one of the names is used exclusively over the others in chronologically newer pull requests, prefer the newest name.

- If one of the names has whitespace and the other doesn't (i.e. is username-like), such as `Foo Bar` vs `FooBar` or `foobar` or `foo-bar123`, but otherwise closely resemble one another, then prefer the human-like name.

- If none of the above suffice in determining a canonical name and the contributor has some other name set on their GitHub profile, use the name from the GitHub profile.

- If no name on their GitHub profile but the profile links to their personal website which unambiguously identifies their preferred name, then use that name.

I'm also thinking about how to handle cases like Nick's, but that will be a project for a different PR. Basically I'd like to be able to find cases of the same person making commits that differ in name *and* email by looking at all the commits present in pull requests opened by the same GitHub user.

<details>
<summary>script</summary>

```toml
[dependencies]
anyhow = "1.0"
git2 = "0.14"
mailmap = "0.1"
```
```rust
use anyhow::{bail, Context, Result};
use git2::{Commit, Oid, Repository};
use mailmap::{Author, Mailmap};
use std::collections::{BTreeMap as Map, BTreeSet as Set};
use std::fmt::{self, Debug};
use std::fs;
use std::path::Path;

const REPO: &str = "/git/rust";

fn main() -> Result<()> {
    let repo = Repository::open(REPO)?;
    let head_oid = repo
        .head()?
        .target()
        .context("expected head to be a direct reference")?;
    let head = repo.find_commit(head_oid)?;

    let mailmap_path = Path::new(REPO).join(".mailmap");
    let mailmap_contents = fs::read_to_string(mailmap_path)?;
    let mailmap = match Mailmap::from_string(mailmap_contents) {
        Ok(mailmap) => mailmap,
        Err(box_error) => bail!("{}", box_error),
    };

    let mut history = Set::new();
    let mut merges = Vec::new();
    let mut authors = Set::new();
    let mut emails = Map::new();
    let mut all_authors = Set::new();
    traverse_left(head, &mut history, &mut merges, &mut authors, &mailmap)?;
    while let Some((commit, i)) = merges.pop() {
        let right = commit.parents().nth(i).unwrap();
        authors.clear();
        traverse_left(right, &mut history, &mut merges, &mut authors, &mailmap)?;
        for author in &authors {
            all_authors.insert(author.clone());
            if !author.email.is_empty() {
                emails
                    .entry(author.email.clone())
                    .or_insert_with(Map::new)
                    .entry(author.name.clone())
                    .or_insert_with(Set::new);
            }
        }
        if let Some(summary) = commit.summary() {
            if let Some(pr) = parse_summary(summary)? {
                for author in &authors {
                    if !author.email.is_empty() {
                        emails
                            .get_mut(&author.email)
                            .unwrap()
                            .get_mut(&author.name)
                            .unwrap()
                            .insert(pr);
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }

    for (email, names) in emails {
        if names.len() > 1 {
            println!("<{}>", email);
            for (name, prs) in names {
                let prs = DebugSet(prs.iter().rev());
                println!("    {} {:?}", name, prs);
            }
        }
    }

    eprintln!("{} commits", history.len());
    eprintln!("{} authors", all_authors.len());
    Ok(())
}

fn traverse_left<'repo>(
    mut commit: Commit<'repo>,
    history: &mut Set<Oid>,
    merges: &mut Vec<(Commit<'repo>, usize)>,
    authors: &mut Set<Author>,
    mailmap: &Mailmap,
) -> Result<()> {
    loop {
        let oid = commit.id();
        if !history.insert(oid) {
            return Ok(());
        }
        let author = author(mailmap, &commit);
        let is_bors = author.name == "bors" && author.email == "bors@rust-lang.org";
        if !is_bors {
            authors.insert(author);
        }
        let mut parents = commit.parents();
        let parent = match parents.next() {
            Some(parent) => parent,
            None => return Ok(()),
        };
        for i in 1..1 + parents.len() {
            merges.push((commit.clone(), i));
        }
        commit = parent;
    }
}

fn parse_summary(summary: &str) -> Result<Option<PullRequest>> {
    let mut rest = None;
    for prefix in [
        "Auto merge of #",
        "Merge pull request #",
        " Manual merge of #",
        "auto merge of #",
        "auto merge of pull req #",
        "rollup merge of #",
        "Rollup merge of #",
        "Rollup merge of  #",
        "Rollup merge of ",
        "Merge PR #",
        "Merge #",
        "Merged #",
    ] {
        if summary.starts_with(prefix) {
            rest = Some(&summary[prefix.len()..]);
            break;
        }
    }
    let rest = match rest {
        Some(rest) => rest,
        None => return Ok(None),
    };
    let end = rest.find([' ', ':']).unwrap_or(rest.len());
    let number = match rest[..end].parse::<u32>() {
        Ok(number) => number,
        Err(err) => {
            eprintln!("{}", summary);
            bail!(err);
        }
    };
    Ok(Some(PullRequest(number)))
}

fn author(mailmap: &Mailmap, commit: &Commit) -> Author {
    let signature = commit.author();
    let name = String::from_utf8_lossy(signature.name_bytes()).into_owned();
    let email = String::from_utf8_lossy(signature.email_bytes()).into_owned();
    mailmap.canonicalize(&Author { name, email })
}

#[derive(Copy, Clone, Ord, PartialOrd, Eq, PartialEq)]
struct PullRequest(u32);

impl Debug for PullRequest {
    fn fmt(&self, formatter: &mut fmt::Formatter) -> fmt::Result {
        write!(formatter, "#{}", self.0)
    }
}

struct DebugSet<T>(T);

impl<T> Debug for DebugSet<T>
where
    T: Iterator + Clone,
    T::Item: Debug,
{
    fn fmt(&self, formatter: &mut fmt::Formatter) -> fmt::Result {
        formatter.debug_set().entries(self.0.clone()).finish()
    }
}
```
</details>
Promote x86_64-unknown-none target to Tier 2 and distribute build artifacts

This implements rust-lang/compiler-team#499 , in which the compiler team accepted the x86_64-unknown-none target for promotion to a Tier 2 platform.
…nkov

Kickstart the inner usage of `macro_metavar_expr`

There can be more use-cases but I am out of ideas.

cc rust-lang#83527
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Windows: Increase a pipe's buffer capacity to 64kb

This brings it inline with typical Linux defaults: https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/pipe.7.html

> Since Linux 2.6.11, the pipe capacity is 16 pages (i.e., 65,536 bytes in a system with a page size of 4096 bytes).

This may also help with rust-lang#45572 and rust-lang#95759 but does not fix either issue. It simply makes them much less likely to be encountered.
hide an #[allow] directive from the Arc::new_cyclic doc example

A minor docs cleanup.
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Apr 8, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 8, 2022

📌 Commit 7b285d0 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Apr 8, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 8, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 7b285d0 with merge e4f5b15...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 8, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing e4f5b15 to master...

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (e4f5b15): comparison url.

Summary:

  • Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
Regressions 😿
(primary)
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
All 😿 🎉
(primary)
count1 2 7 0 0 2
mean2 0.4% 1.0% N/A N/A 0.4%
max 0.4% 1.3% N/A N/A 0.4%

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. number of relevant changes

  2. the arithmetic mean of the percent change

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Apr 8, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Seems likely to be the same as #95440 (comment); marking as not a real regression.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@rustbot rustbot removed the perf-regression Performance regression. label Apr 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.