Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix inference issues with unconstrained base expr in type_changing_struct_update #97705

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 12, 2022

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Use fresh infer vars to guide inference along in type_changing_struct_update.

Fixes #96878

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jun 3, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @michaelwoerister

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 3, 2022
@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

r? rust-lang/compiler (do we have an alias for the types team?)

compiler-errors added a commit to compiler-errors/highfive that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
inspired by rust-lang/rust#97705 (comment)
> (do we have an alias for the types team?)

cc @rust-lang/types -- I only added the members of t-types who are already on the reviewer rotation, specifically excluding @nikomatsakis and @spastorino since they aren't currently on the rotation.

also add myself to diagnostics since i am a member of that wg, and move @cjgillot to the compiler team from the compiler team contributors grouping.
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

r? @lcnr

I'm r=me, but adding someone on the types team.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned lcnr and unassigned estebank Jun 10, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm r=me

there's one optional improvement i found, if you're interested in implementing that

self.tcx.mk_adt(*adt, fresh_substs),
|_| {},
);
let base_ty = self.shallow_resolve(base_ty);
match base_ty.kind() {
ty::Adt(base_adt, base_subs) if adt == base_adt => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you now bug! if that isn#t the case? or at least delay_span_bug if it's ty::Error? would safe us 8 columns of indentation ^^

Copy link
Member Author

@compiler-errors compiler-errors Jun 10, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ironically, I don't think check_expr_has_type_or_error actually returns ty::Error when the expected type != the checked type of the input expr, hence us (still) needing to call report_mismatched_types on line before:1605/after:1624. I can easily check, though.

I will see if I can simplify this, though. It can at least be changed to a let-chain :)

Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also, while you're in that file, can you change https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/ac33d2b3e1359930a02653f0c61a124947912ed8/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs#L1538 to not do a string comparison 😆

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

I was able to turn the redundant report_mismatched_types into a span_bug! and I removed the string comparison with "union".

@bors r=lcnr

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

wake up bors

@bors r=lcnr

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 11, 2022

📌 Commit 5052911 has been approved by lcnr

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 11, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 11, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 5052911 with merge e652caa...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 12, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: lcnr
Pushing e652caa to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 12, 2022
@bors bors merged commit e652caa into rust-lang:master Jun 12, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone Jun 12, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (e652caa): comparison url.

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
  • Secondary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
-3.4% -3.4% 1
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) -3.4% -3.4% 1

Cycles

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
3.4% 5.8% 8
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
3.1% 4.4% 3
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) 3.4% 5.8% 8

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2

  2. number of relevant changes 2

Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2022
…_update_is_probably_complete, r=oli-obk

Make `type_changing_struct_update` no longer an incomplete feature

After rust-lang#97705, I don't see what would make it incomplete anymore. `check_expr_struct_fields` seems to now implement the RFC to the letter.

r? `@nikomatsakis`
cc `@rust-lang/types`
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2022
…_update_is_probably_complete, r=oli-obk

Make `type_changing_struct_update` no longer an incomplete feature

After rust-lang#97705, I don't see what would make it incomplete anymore. `check_expr_struct_fields` seems to now implement the RFC to the letter.

r? ``@nikomatsakis``
cc ``@rust-lang/types``
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2022
…_update_is_probably_complete, r=oli-obk

Make `type_changing_struct_update` no longer an incomplete feature

After rust-lang#97705, I don't see what would make it incomplete anymore. `check_expr_struct_fields` seems to now implement the RFC to the letter.

r? ```@nikomatsakis```
cc ```@rust-lang/types```
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2022
…_update_is_probably_complete, r=oli-obk

Make `type_changing_struct_update` no longer an incomplete feature

After rust-lang#97705, I don't see what would make it incomplete anymore. `check_expr_struct_fields` seems to now implement the RFC to the letter.

r? ````@nikomatsakis````
cc ````@rust-lang/types````
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2022
…_update_is_probably_complete, r=oli-obk

Make `type_changing_struct_update` no longer an incomplete feature

After rust-lang#97705, I don't see what would make it incomplete anymore. `check_expr_struct_fields` seems to now implement the RFC to the letter.

r? `````@nikomatsakis`````
cc `````@rust-lang/types`````
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2022
…_update_is_probably_complete, r=oli-obk

Make `type_changing_struct_update` no longer an incomplete feature

After rust-lang#97705, I don't see what would make it incomplete anymore. `check_expr_struct_fields` seems to now implement the RFC to the letter.

r? ``````@nikomatsakis``````
cc ``````@rust-lang/types``````
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

type_changing_struct_update: regression in type inference
8 participants