Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Security vulnerability disclosure process #593

Closed
cruatta opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #603
Closed

Security vulnerability disclosure process #593

cruatta opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #603

Comments

@cruatta
Copy link

cruatta commented Apr 10, 2023

First of all, thank you for creating and maintaining scanservjs. This project made my Canon MP620 useful again.

What is the security vulnerability disclosure process you would like a security researcher to follow if they've found a vulnerability in scanservjs?

Thank you,
Cameron

@sbs20
Copy link
Owner

sbs20 commented Apr 24, 2023

Thanka Cameron. I am closing this in favour of #599

@sbs20 sbs20 closed this as completed Apr 24, 2023
sbs20 added a commit that referenced this issue May 7, 2023
sbs20 added a commit that referenced this issue May 7, 2023
sbs20 added a commit that referenced this issue May 7, 2023
Closes #599

This was an issue privately reported by @cruatta in #593 who also helped in resolving the issue - huge thanks!

I also updated some other unit tests to use `assert.match` for better error reporting when (if) tests are broken.
sbs20 added a commit that referenced this issue May 7, 2023
Closes #599

This was an issue privately reported by @cruatta in #593 who also helped in resolving the issue - huge thanks!

I also updated some other unit tests to use `assert.match` for better error reporting when (if) tests are broken.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants