Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update sbt-dotty to 0.5.2 #301

Closed

Conversation

scala-steward
Copy link
Contributor

Updates ch.epfl.lamp:sbt-dotty from 0.4.6 to 0.5.2.

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

Ignore future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "ch.epfl.lamp", artifactId = "sbt-dotty" } ]

labels: sbt-plugin-update, semver-minor

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ addSbtPlugin("com.geirsson" % "sbt-ci-release" % "1.5.5")
addSbtPlugin("com.eed3si9n" % "sbt-buildinfo" % "0.10.0")
addSbtPlugin("org.scalameta" % "sbt-mdoc" % "2.2.16")
addSbtPlugin("org.scalameta" % "sbt-scalafmt" % "2.3.4")
addSbtPlugin("ch.epfl.lamp" % "sbt-dotty" % "0.4.6")
addSbtPlugin("ch.epfl.lamp" % "sbt-dotty" % "0.5.2")
Copy link
Contributor

@tgodzik tgodzik Jan 27, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This might need to go with the sbt 1.5.0 update 🤔

@larsrh larsrh mentioned this pull request Feb 16, 2021
@scala-steward
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #314.

@scala-steward scala-steward deleted the update/sbt-dotty-0.5.2 branch February 16, 2021 19:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants