-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introduce unknown address type. #248
Conversation
9ff4596
to
f817197
Compare
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ jobs: | |||
with: | |||
repository: smartcontractkit/chainlink | |||
# ref: develop | |||
ref: fix-fee-quoter |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about making it work as a manual trigger as well? I mean overriding this value with every PR is very error prone. Maybe ability to trigger the job from GHA with custom branch from chainlink would be sufficient just to run these tests before merging? cc @b-gopalswami
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I pitched this idea before and received some pushback. I'm not against it, it should be straightforward as a flow:
- comment on the pull request "cmd branch " to on demand run the test using the appropriate chainlink branch
- some sort of trigger on comment with github actions. Parse the comment and ensure it comes from PR author, etc. then trigger the workflow with the branch name
Please make sure to revert back to |
f817197
to
dfbaf57
Compare
|
This PR replaces the many account types (string, []byte, types.Account) with
UnknownAddress
andUnknownEncodedAddress
. These types are now used across the CCIP code and can extended in the future to add chain agnostic encoding and validation functions.Related chainlink changes: