Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bring KMS client and multiclient over to chainlink #14484

Merged

Conversation

ogtownsend
Copy link
Collaborator

Requires

Resolves

@ogtownsend ogtownsend requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2024 16:21
@ogtownsend ogtownsend force-pushed the chore/move-multiclient-and-kmsclient-to-chainlink branch from 8e3dcdc to ce17604 Compare September 18, 2024 16:22
@ogtownsend ogtownsend requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2024 16:52
@ogtownsend ogtownsend force-pushed the chore/move-multiclient-and-kmsclient-to-chainlink branch from 31e2aa6 to 2381add Compare September 18, 2024 16:54
Copy link
Contributor

@AnieeG AnieeG left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You will need to run go mod tidy in integration-tests

@connorwstein connorwstein requested review from a team as code owners September 18, 2024 20:42
@connorwstein connorwstein requested review from Atrax1 and removed request for a team September 18, 2024 20:42
AnieeG
AnieeG previously approved these changes Sep 18, 2024
connorwstein
connorwstein previously approved these changes Sep 18, 2024
…ithub.com:smartcontractkit/chainlink into chore/move-multiclient-and-kmsclient-to-chainlink
@connorwstein connorwstein dismissed stale reviews from AnieeG and themself via 7ed0046 September 18, 2024 20:58
@@ -406,7 +406,6 @@ func (h *homeChain) AddNodes(
p2pIDs [][32]byte,
capabilityIDs [][32]byte,
) {
// Need to sort, otherwise _checkIsValidUniqueSubset onChain will fail
sortP2PIDS(p2pIDs)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty sure this and the associated function def'n can be deleted, sorting is no longer a requirement

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Anyway, not required to do in this PR ;-)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this whole directory could probably deleted no? Thats what I had in mind with CCIP-3049

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If these helpers aren't used anywhere and these tests are not needed, yes.

@cl-sonarqube-production
Copy link

@connorwstein connorwstein added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 19, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 19, 2024
@connorwstein connorwstein added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 19, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit d2a01ca Sep 19, 2024
158 checks passed
@connorwstein connorwstein deleted the chore/move-multiclient-and-kmsclient-to-chainlink branch September 19, 2024 17:10
momentmaker added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
…tractkit/chainlink into re-2964/goreleaser-ccip

* 're-2964/goreleaser-ccip' of https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink:
  Fix data race in TestLogPoller_Replay (#14431)
  Fix CCIP Load Test Faulty Fund Return (#14499)
  use tx in insertLogsWithinTx (#14361)
  Bring KMS client and multiclient over to chainlink (#14484)
  CCIP-3420: Fix IsRequestTriggeredWithinTimeframe (#1445) (#14498)
  [TT-1345] option to use predeployed contracts in OCR tests (#13758)
  CCIP-3428 Enabling ccip smoke test for testnet (#14452)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants