-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add missing field to ExecutionResources #1301
Merged
ddoktorski
merged 7 commits into
development
from
tomaszkumor/execution_resources_hotfix
Feb 23, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4779533
Add missing field to ExecutionResources
tkumor3 759902d
linter
tkumor3 fe9ed31
add test
tkumor3 fa48097
rename test
tkumor3 7dd5972
Merge branch 'development' into tomaszkumor/execution_resources_hotfix
ddoktorski 4e073b1
Assert other execution resources fields in test
ddoktorski abfa894
Use integers instead of felts for execution resources fields
ddoktorski File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nitpick: since this is a hardcoded transaction, it should be possible to just assert specific values that we expect (and not just asserting that it is not None), which would give us another layer of testing (I mean serialization).
if you agree, I'd suggest we open an issue and deal with it in a separate PR, at later date.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In an ideal scenario, we should probably have unit tests for out RPC schemas 😅 However the check that you suggest can definitely improve this test. Let's discuss it further in #1219