-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 531
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix VLAN error introduced with new 4.9 kernel behavior #1001
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Jipan Yang <jipan.yang@alibaba-inc.com>
retest this please |
lguohan
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2019
|
without the fix.
|
tonytitus
pushed a commit
to tonytitus/sonic-swss
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2019
The change includes two parts: <1> Bring member out of default VLAN 1 upon putting port/lag in a VLAN <2> Second part was done by @tieguoevan ( https://github.com/tieguoevan) and incorporated here to avoid test error that would follow change <1>. Summary: The Bridge interface needs to be up all the time. Otherwise, the command bridge vlan will fail. Not sure it is a kernel bug, but it cause error when clear all vlan members and reconfigure it. create a dummy interface in the Bridge to keep it up all the time Signed-off-by: Jipan Yang <jipan.yang@alibaba-inc.com>
yxieca
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2019
The change includes two parts: <1> Bring member out of default VLAN 1 upon putting port/lag in a VLAN <2> Second part was done by @tieguoevan ( https://github.com/tieguoevan) and incorporated here to avoid test error that would follow change <1>. Summary: The Bridge interface needs to be up all the time. Otherwise, the command bridge vlan will fail. Not sure it is a kernel bug, but it cause error when clear all vlan members and reconfigure it. create a dummy interface in the Bridge to keep it up all the time Signed-off-by: Jipan Yang <jipan.yang@alibaba-inc.com>
@jipanyang How about a port need to attach vlan 1 and other vlans (trunk port)? |
EdenGri
pushed a commit
to EdenGri/sonic-swss
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2022
…1001) Signed-off-by: Akhilesh Samineni <akhilesh.samineni@broadcom.com>
oleksandrivantsiv
pushed a commit
to oleksandrivantsiv/sonic-swss
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Jipan Yang jipan.yang@alibaba-inc.com
What I did
The change includes two parts:
<1> Bring member out of default VLAN 1 upon putting port/lag in a VLAN
<2> Second part was done by @tieguoevan ( https://github.com/tieguoevan) and incorporated here to avoid test error that would follow change <1>.
Without change <2>
Why I did it
Fix
#998
sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#2658
and
How I verified it
Details if related