Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release v1.6.15 #364

Merged
merged 28 commits into from
Jan 29, 2021
Merged

Release v1.6.15 #364

merged 28 commits into from
Jan 29, 2021

Conversation

fantavlik
Copy link
Contributor

Bug fixes

#301 Fix chunk synchronization
#327 Rename and cleanup follow-up for chunk synchronization
#352 Allow supplying of a key-value body when calling Context.post()

Minor changes

#350 Initial end-to-end tests for streaming, reporting, generating custom search commands
#348 Update copyright years to 2020
#346 Readme updates to urls, terminology, and formatting
#317 Fix deprecation warnings

shilpabijam and others added 28 commits May 29, 2020 10:10
Previously, when an external command used the SCPv2 (chunked=true)
protocol via splunklib and returned with 50,000 or more rows for
one chunk, it would send two replies intead of one. This caused
the external command to get out of sync, sending chunk replies
before reading the corresponding request.

Fixes #150
Allow suppying of a key-value body when calling Context.post()
@fantavlik fantavlik changed the title Release/1.6.15 Release v1.6.15 Jan 28, 2021

# TODO: DVPL-6448: splunklib.searchcommands | Add support for partial: true when it is implemented in
# ChunkedExternProcessor (See SPL-103525)
#
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need to remove the bug#?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean you think the bug has addressed and we can remove this comment? We are OK to refer to ticket numbers as long as we don't provide links if that's the concern.

@ljiang1 ljiang1 self-requested a review January 28, 2021 23:08
@fantavlik fantavlik merged commit b36d6eb into master Jan 29, 2021
@fantavlik fantavlik deleted the release/1.6.15 branch January 29, 2021 02:11
@fantavlik
Copy link
Contributor Author

FYI there was one failing test which is known to be flaky for 8.x Splunk versions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants