-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 677
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat/chain-id #3111
Feat/chain-id #3111
Conversation
… value in GlobalContext (which in turn gets it from the ClarityInstance, from StacksChainState)
…structs for block and transaction connections
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## next #3111 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 83.97% 83.75% -0.22%
==========================================
Files 265 265
Lines 207719 207954 +235
==========================================
- Hits 174426 174166 -260
- Misses 33293 33788 +495
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
… do it on node boot-up. Also, downgrade the tx type for migraiton to DBTx so we don't accidentally depend on the first block header information (which we might not have)
…s public key, so also make sure that the last contact time is positive when considering timeouts
…ell as the `allowed` column
…to the latest schema before header sync
execute_with_parameters( | ||
program, | ||
ClarityVersion::Clarity2, | ||
StacksEpochId::Epoch20, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why not Epoch21? same as below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, that's an oversight on my end. Will fix.
Feat: rename blockstack-core to stacks-inspect
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for that change with test_only_mainnet_to_chain_id
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
This PR address #2982 by adding
chain-id
as a global variable inClarity2
, which resolves toStacksChainState::chain_id
.