Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: expose fetch to custom functions #1079

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 14, 2020
Merged

feat: expose fetch to custom functions #1079

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 14, 2020

Conversation

P0lip
Copy link
Contributor

@P0lip P0lip commented Apr 12, 2020

Checklist

  • Tests added / updated
  • Docs added / updated

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Additional context

Make sure to select this option before you start reviewing image
I moved a few tests under the same block and therefore the diff is slightly noisier than it could be.

I didn't update documentation, since despite having access to fetch, you cannot really use it until the support for async functions #1058 is brought.

@P0lip P0lip added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 12, 2020
@P0lip P0lip requested a review from nulltoken April 12, 2020 20:21
@P0lip P0lip self-assigned this Apr 12, 2020
@P0lip
Copy link
Contributor Author

P0lip commented Apr 12, 2020

@marbemac can you think of any functions that might be useful from the perspective of Studio user?

@P0lip P0lip force-pushed the feat/expose-fetch branch from 454108b to 8370a05 Compare April 12, 2020 20:26
@nulltoken nulltoken mentioned this pull request Apr 13, 2020
4 tasks
@P0lip
Copy link
Contributor Author

P0lip commented Apr 13, 2020

@nulltoken mind taking a stab at reviewing the PR?

@P0lip P0lip merged commit 50eaf5b into develop Apr 14, 2020
@P0lip P0lip deleted the feat/expose-fetch branch April 14, 2020 13:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants