Editorial: Add auto‑linking for dotted intrinsics #2041
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
this comment (and the surrounding discussion) may be relevant, since the "legacy" intrinsic names haven't been removed yet. (@ljharb?) |
|
#2056 removes the legacy intrinsics, which may subsume this PR (we'll leave this open until after it's merged, though, just in case) |
ExE-Boss
force-pushed
the
editorial/auto-link-dotted-intrinsics
branch
from
fe5f260 to
5ef1e97
Compare
|
This was done in #2056. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was already done for %Function.prototype% in f1b22ef (#1376).
Depends on:
Preview (#sec-well-known-intrinsic-objects)