-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Race condition on startup when using configuring controller via configmaps #3720
Comments
When using the informed watcher to watch a config map, previously add events were being processed in a goroutine with no syncrhonization making it so that code may try to access the values backed by the configmaps before they are initialized. This commit makes it so that the Start method of the informer will wait for the add event to occur at least once for all config maps it is watching. This commit also undoes the workaround added in knative#1929 which was working around the race condition identified in knative#1907 (and in tektoncd/pipeline#3720). This means that if the synchronization was removed, the impacted test would start flaking again. If we wanted it to reliably fail in that case, we could introduce a sleep in the callback but that doesn't seem worth it. I also tested this change by manually patching the changes into my clone of tektoncd/pipeline and following the repro steps at tektoncd/pipeline#2815 (comment) Before the change I can reproduce the issue, and after the change, I can't! :D
When using the informed watcher to watch a config map, previously add events were being processed in a goroutine with no syncrhonization making it so that code may try to access the values backed by the configmaps before they are initialized. This commit makes it so that the Start method of the informer will wait for the add event to occur at least once for all config maps it is watching. This commit also undoes the workaround added in knative#1929 which was working around the race condition identified in knative#1907 (and in tektoncd/pipeline#3720). This means that if the synchronization was removed, the impacted test would start flaking again. If we wanted it to reliably fail in that case, we could introduce a sleep in the callback but that doesn't seem worth it. I also tested this change by manually patching the changes into my clone of tektoncd/pipeline and following the repro steps at tektoncd/pipeline#2815 (comment) Before the change I can reproduce the issue, and after the change, I can't! :D Fixes knative#1960
When using the informed watcher to watch a config map, previously add events were being processed in a goroutine with no syncrhonization making it so that code may try to access the values backed by the configmaps before they are initialized. This commit makes it so that the Start method of the informer will wait for the add event to occur at least once for all config maps it is watching. This commit also undoes the workaround added in knative#1929 which was working around the race condition identified in knative#1907 (and in tektoncd/pipeline#3720). This means that if the synchronization was removed, the impacted test would start flaking again. If we wanted it to reliably fail in that case, we could introduce a sleep in the callback but that doesn't seem worth it. I also tested this change by manually patching the changes into my clone of tektoncd/pipeline and following the repro steps at tektoncd/pipeline#2815 (comment) Before the change I can reproduce the issue, and after the change, I can't! :D Fixes knative#1960
When using the informed watcher to watch a config map, previously add events were being processed in a goroutine with no syncrhonization making it so that code may try to access the values backed by the configmaps before they are initialized. This commit makes it so that the Start method of the informer will wait for the add event to occur at least once for all config maps it is watching. This commit also undoes the workaround added in knative#1929 which was working around the race condition identified in knative#1907 (and in tektoncd/pipeline#3720). This means that if the synchronization was removed, the impacted test would start flaking again. If we wanted it to reliably fail in that case, we could introduce a sleep in the callback but that doesn't seem worth it. I also tested this change by manually patching the changes into my clone of tektoncd/pipeline and following the repro steps at tektoncd/pipeline#2815 (comment) Before the change I can reproduce the issue, and after the change, I can't! :D Fixes knative#1960
Okay knative/pkg#2036 is an attempt to fix this! If it's accepted, we should see these races fixed when we next update knative/pkg :D 🙏 |
When using the informed watcher to watch a config map, previously add events were being processed in a goroutine with no syncrhonization making it so that code may try to access the values backed by the configmaps before they are initialized. This commit makes it so that the Start method of the informer will wait for the add event to occur at least once for all config maps it is watching. This commit also undoes the workaround added in knative#1929 which was working around the race condition identified in knative#1907 (and in tektoncd/pipeline#3720). This means that if the synchronization was removed, the impacted test would start flaking again. If we wanted it to reliably fail in that case, we could introduce a sleep in the callback but that doesn't seem worth it. I also tested this change by manually patching the changes into my clone of tektoncd/pipeline and following the repro steps at tektoncd/pipeline#2815 (comment) Before the change I can reproduce the issue, and after the change, I can't! :D Fixes knative#1960
When using the informed watcher to watch a config map, previously add events were being processed in a goroutine with no syncrhonization making it so that code may try to access the values backed by the configmaps before they are initialized. This commit makes it so that the Start method of the informer will wait for the add event to occur at least once for all config maps it is watching. This commit also undoes the workaround added in knative#1929 which was working around the race condition identified in knative#1907 (and in tektoncd/pipeline#3720). This means that if the synchronization was removed, the impacted test would start flaking again. If we wanted it to reliably fail in that case, we could introduce a sleep in the callback but that doesn't seem worth it. I also tested this change by manually patching the changes into my clone of tektoncd/pipeline and following the repro steps at tektoncd/pipeline#2815 (comment) Before the change I can reproduce the issue, and after the change, I can't! :D Fixes knative#1960
* Fix race: Make informed watcher start wait for Add event 🏎️ When using the informed watcher to watch a config map, previously add events were being processed in a goroutine with no syncrhonization making it so that code may try to access the values backed by the configmaps before they are initialized. This commit makes it so that the Start method of the informer will wait for the add event to occur at least once for all config maps it is watching. This commit also undoes the workaround added in #1929 which was working around the race condition identified in #1907 (and in tektoncd/pipeline#3720). This means that if the synchronization was removed, the impacted test would start flaking again. If we wanted it to reliably fail in that case, we could introduce a sleep in the callback but that doesn't seem worth it. I also tested this change by manually patching the changes into my clone of tektoncd/pipeline and following the repro steps at tektoncd/pipeline#2815 (comment) Before the change I can reproduce the issue, and after the change, I can't! :D Fixes #1960 * Make synced callback and named wait group private 🕵️ These utility objects don't really make sense to expose as part of the informed watcher package and are only used by the informed watcher. Writing tests for unexported code makes me a bit :( but hopefully these will get moved to some other package one day. And there's really no reason to expose these to users of knative/pkg at the moment.
We are still seeing this issue with 0.24.x, if we do a restart of the controller it will create an affinity assitant even if Wondering why we don't make sure that we read the configmap before the controller can start working. |
@shinji62 sounds like a bump indeed 🤔 can you create an new issue for this ? |
Expected Behavior
When a user configures the Pipeline controller's behavior via configmaps, e.g. disabling the affinity assistant or enabling custom tasks, the controller should always respect these configured values.
When the controller tries to use these configured values, it should always reflect the settings in the config maps if they exist.
Actual Behavior
We are using an object provided by knative/pkg called configStore to access feature flags (configuration provided by users via config maps). It used to be that we loaded these values once on startup but in #2637 we switched over to using these config store objects so we could hot reload changes made to the config maps the while the controller is running.
cmw.Start
is InformedWatcher.Startpipeline/pkg/client/resource/informers/externalversions/factory.go
Lines 115 to 120 in 0fddf2e
The gorutine started in (7) (client-go cache controller's Run I think?) is what (waves hands) ultimately leads to reading the configured values from the config maps and storing them such that when the tekton controller tries to read these values (via FromContextOrDefaults) the idea is that it will see the values populated by the goroutine.
The problem is that there is no synchronization so sometimes the controller tries to read those values before the goroutines have populated them.
This causes tests of this functionality to sometimes fail, but more importantly, there is a chance (a very small chance) this could happen to users.
Steps to Reproduce the Problem
(3) would happen SO rarely that you might never be able to reproduce it - see #2815 (comment) on how to reproduce this via the integration tests
Additional Info
This is the bug in knative/pkg describing the problem and requesting it to be fixed or a way to work around it: knative/pkg#1960
I think this is the route cause of flakey failures of:
What to do??
While we definitely want to fix this issue, I think that letting our tests continue to flake because of this issue is reducing the quality of the signal we're getting from our tests. Now that we know this is a problem, we don't need the tests to keep failing the way they do.
But because the details of this are hidden in unexported knative/pkg code I'm not sure how to work around it. Some ideas, all terrible:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: